2015
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/7/1453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which method to use for a fast assessment of body fat percentage?

Abstract: Body position affects body water distribution and in turn the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which may consequently distort conclusions about an individual's body composition.We compared body fat percentage (BFP) obtained with leg-to-leg-BIA (LL) and hand-to-leg-BIA (HL) with the reference values.The BFPs of 97 individuals were determined with an LL- (Tanita TBF 215GS, Japan) and HL- (Akern, STA/BIA, Italy) BIA-analyser and with reference skinfold thickness (SF) measurements. Each subject … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other measures, such as skin‐fold thickness, waist circumference, or waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) estimate abdominal fat mass, whereas body impedance analysis (BIA) provides an estimate of the total amount of adipose and muscle tissue in the body . However, the accuracy of anthropometric methods and their capability to differentiate subcompartments, such as visceral versus subcutaneous fat, is limited . Accordingly, imaging methods that directly depict body fat and muscle volumes are being used increasingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measures, such as skin‐fold thickness, waist circumference, or waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) estimate abdominal fat mass, whereas body impedance analysis (BIA) provides an estimate of the total amount of adipose and muscle tissue in the body . However, the accuracy of anthropometric methods and their capability to differentiate subcompartments, such as visceral versus subcutaneous fat, is limited . Accordingly, imaging methods that directly depict body fat and muscle volumes are being used increasingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, different manufacturers of BIA analysers treat the underlying regression equations as business secrets, which is not likely to change, and therefore BIA (as a method on its own) lacks thorough scientific evaluation. To avoid this limitation, some authors have suggested the use of direct BIA measures, thus impedance and resistance values [16, 39]; yet, cut-off impedance and resistance values for underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese subjects, standardised to a selected reference method, are currently not available. Last, in the present study, UWW could not be reliably performed in some subjects due to their inability to perform a full underwater exhalation, although no non-swimmers were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These, however, are not methods that can usually be performed in the field. Not surprisingly, new field methods, such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), have gained popularity [12], although the validity of BIA measurements has been questioned [13][14][15], and thorough scientific evaluation of the method is difficult to perform as different BIA analysers are being used and their underlying equations are inaccessible [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) data, fat-free mass 15 , body fat 16 and phase angle 17 were calculated.…”
Section: Assessment Of Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%