2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which Transition Metal Atoms Can Be Embedded into Two-Dimensional Molybdenum Dichalcogenides and Add Magnetism?

Abstract: Atomic structures of symmetric/distorted "X-sub" configurations, along with the "TM@X″ configuration are illustrated. Formation energies and magnetic moment for different atomic structures of TM atoms deposited on Mo X 2 layers are presented. Spin-polarization densities and electronic structures are shown, as obtained from first-principles calculations (PDF)■ AUTHOR INFORMATION

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct substitution can also be achieved via ion implantation, but it is technically difficult, as it requires very low ion energies (below 100 eV) or needs an additional coating of buffer layer and post‐annealing, [ 9 ] as otherwise the ions would pass through the atomically thin target. [ 10,11 ] As for 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), the majority of the direct doping methods lead to doping in the chalcogen sublattice, [ 5 ] while controllable doping of these materials in the TM sublattice is extremely important, because the variation of their valence d‐electrons occupancy results in extensive modification of their electronic structure, exciton characteristics, [ 12 ] magnetism, [ 13–15 ] and catalytic behavior. [ 16 ] Finally, as with bulk system, while the substitutional doping can be realized during growth by using chemical vapor transport (CVT) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques, [ 17 ] the control over the spatial distribution of dopants still remains challenging, and doping concentrations less than 7% are normally achievable.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct substitution can also be achieved via ion implantation, but it is technically difficult, as it requires very low ion energies (below 100 eV) or needs an additional coating of buffer layer and post‐annealing, [ 9 ] as otherwise the ions would pass through the atomically thin target. [ 10,11 ] As for 2D transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), the majority of the direct doping methods lead to doping in the chalcogen sublattice, [ 5 ] while controllable doping of these materials in the TM sublattice is extremely important, because the variation of their valence d‐electrons occupancy results in extensive modification of their electronic structure, exciton characteristics, [ 12 ] magnetism, [ 13–15 ] and catalytic behavior. [ 16 ] Finally, as with bulk system, while the substitutional doping can be realized during growth by using chemical vapor transport (CVT) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques, [ 17 ] the control over the spatial distribution of dopants still remains challenging, and doping concentrations less than 7% are normally achievable.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calculations further show that adding S or Se atoms (as dimers) markedly lowers the total energy of the system by –3.84, –3.93, –4.21, and –3.26 eV for Ti, V, Cr, and Fe (with respect to the dimer adsorbed on the pristine surface) and explain the mechanism of the dislocation climb (Figure 3e) and eventual disappearance. To get a comprehensive picture, we also studied the energetics of TM atoms in other positions, e.g., in X‐sub positions reported for Mo‐based TMDs, [ 14 ] and also investigated in more detail the behavior of TM atoms in WS 2 and Janus WSeS system. The results are presented in Figure S5, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total magnetic moments are 2.0 and 2.3 μ B per cell, respectively. The proposed “X‐sub” configuration, [ 29 ] which can be regarded as a complex consisting Nd S and a S adatom (Nd S + S), is nonmagnetic (see Figure S5, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of intrinsic defects have been found to form local moments [27][28][29][30][31] in MX 2 materials and suggestions have been made to make the MX 2 materials magnetic by adsorption of impurity atoms, 27,28,32,33 or by substituting M or X atoms with impurity atoms. 28,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] Even though the Mermin-Wagner theorem 7,8 tells us that there is no long range ordering in two dimensions for isotropic Heisenberg exchange, few attempts have been made to determine the exchange coupling between magnetic impurities 33,37,38,40,41,47,51 and it was only very recently that the magnetic anistropy of a defect was calculated, for an antisite defect in MoS 2 . 31 Replacing some of the M atoms with Hund's-rule coupled transition metal atoms like Mn or Fe gives rise to deep impurity levels in the semiconductor gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%