Whistleblowing in India: evidence from accounting students and professionals

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine whistleblowing behavior in the accounting community (students and professionals) in an emerging economy – India. Design/methodology/approach Using a case-based approach, data were collected from 263 accounting students and 268 accounting professionals in India. Findings Using multivariate and univariate analyses of variance and logistic regressions, the authors provided evidence on how accounting students and professionals behave in a whistleblowing environment. Specifically, the authors found mixed results when comparing the behavior of accounting students and professionals in a whistleblowing scenario. All subjects reflected a more collectivist attitude, although professionals were more concerned about “fixing” the identified internal control problem (a “shared” problem). Both groups expressed a firm desire to collect more evidence against the likely fraudster. Practical implications In this era of global offshoring of services including accounting, the current study makes significant contributions to the accounting ethics literature and the accounting profession by analyzing whistleblowing behavior from an Indian perspective – a highly underrepresented area in the accounting ethics literature. The study aims to guide companies and investors in the US and elsewhere that do business in India. Originality/value While the accounting literature has plenty of research on whistleblowing in the Western world, there is a dearth of literature on whistleblowing in India. This paper is among the first to document whistleblowing behavior in India, a country that prides itself on its vast availability of English-speaking and technically sound accounting professionals.

The influence of issues on moral judgment: A comparison of college students and business practitioners in the Republic of Croatia

“…Their superior moral reasoning is possibly the result of age, experience, increased proximity of consequences, maturation and/or education. Our results confirm earlier work on the primacy of business practitioners over students (Brody et al, 2020; Curtis et al, 2017; Ford & Richardson, 1994; Kraft & Singhapakdi, 1991; O'Fallon & Butterfield, 2005; Wood et al, 1988).…”

“…That is, Italian culture is posited as impacting the finding that there was a difference in evaluating layoffs but no difference in evaluating bank loans (Curtis et al, 2017). Continuing, while professionals and students tended to agree on issues surrounding whistleblowing, professionals in India were more concerned with fixing problems arising from whistleblowing than their student counterpart (Brody et al, 2020).…”

Cross-cultural issues in business ethics: A review and research agenda

“…Kaplan et al (2009) agreed with this result but he suggested that this result is true only when an anonymous reporting arrangement was available. Many scholars found that age is the important factor in business ethics maturity (Brody et al, 2020; Carrol and Cannon (1997); Ermasova et al, 2017, 2018; Loe et al, 2000; Nguyen et al, 2019). According to Loe et al (2000), the review of empirical articles found that nearly 50% of relevant studies found significant positive relationships between age and ethical judgments.…”

Whistleblower protection in developing countries: a review of challenges and prospects

“…It is worth noting that organisational retaliation targeting whistleblowers are always very evident and almost immediate in public administration in developing countries, where administrators are more socially embedded in one another, and whose interests or loyalty lie either in political or social groups than with the organisational or 'public interest' (e.g. Jamil 2002;De Maria 2005;Brody et al 2020). Uys and Senekal (2008) refers to this as morality of loyalty which they contrast with morality of principle, underpinned in the legal-rational principles of whistleblowing in public bureaucracies.…”