White-Box Testing Strategy for a Solar Tracking Device Using NodeMCU Lua ESP8266 Wi-Fi Network Development Board Module

Jurj, Sorin Liviu; Rotar, Raul; Opritoiu, Flavius; Vlăduţiu, Mircea

doi:10.1109/siitme.2018.8599250

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As an added security measure, small IoT devices employ dedicated IP addresses for internal networks, meaning that external networks cannot connect to the devices directly. Security for over-the-air updates (OTA) is ensured in this study for cloud servers, tiny IoT devices, and the connectivity between cloud and small IoT devices [27].…”

Section: A Evaluation Of Iot Device Private Network Connectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Implementation of Security Gatway for IoT Devices Security

2023

IJCCCE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the Internet of Things (IoT) is growing in popularity globally, which has resulted in a rise in cyber threats, experts are focusing more on its security. The majority of IoT security research to date has concentrated on huge devices, while small IoT devices have received comparably little attention. Our primary purpose is, therefore, to research how to ensure the operation of IoT devices that are small. The security gateway is a Security Settings on the Gateway for RaspberryPi built gateway that may link Internet of Things devices to their private network, safeguarding IoT devices from exposure to external networks. In addition, a variety of Security Settings on the Gateway for RaspberryPi security settings are installed, including fiel2ban and a Security Settings on the Gateway for RaspberryPi firewall, in order to avoid brute force and dictionary attacks. This article also studies the communication between Internet of Things (IoT) devices utilizing various secure communications, including Secure Shell (SSH), and analyzes their performance in a variety of circumstances. The gateway's experimental evaluation reveals that the proposed framework can secure tiny IoT devices. Index Terms— Internet of Things (IoT), Security IoT, Security Gateway, Security Settings on the Gateway for RaspberryPi, ESP8266.

show abstract

Section: A Evaluation Of Iot Device Private Network Connectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Implementation of Security Gatway for IoT Devices Security

2023

IJCCCE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The work in [17] presents a WBST method that sends virtual sensor data from a dedicated cloud platform to a solar tracking device to verify its functionality. The communication channel is an essential component of the WBST as it connects the local hardware to the server via Wi-Fi industrial scientific and medical (ISM) band.…”

Section: White-box Software Testing Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Solar Reliability Factor of a Dual-Axis Solar Tracking System Using Energy-Efficient Testing Solutions

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an improved mathematical model for calculating the solar test factor (STF) and solar reliability factor (SRF) of a photovoltaic (PV) automated equipment. By employing a unified metrics system and a combined testing suite encompassing various energy-efficient testing techniques, the aim of this paper is to determine a general fault coverage and improve the global SRF of a closed-loop dual-axis solar tracking system. Accelerated testing coupled with reliability analysis are essential tools for assessing the performance of modern solar tracking devices since PV system malfunctioning is directly connected to economic loss, which is an important aspect for the solar energy domain. The experimental results show that the unified metrics system is potentially suitable for assessing the reliability evaluation of many types of solar tracking systems. Additionally, the proposed combined testing platform proves efficient regarding fault coverage (overall coverage of 66.35% for all test scenarios), test time (an average of 275 min for 2864 test cycles), and power consumption (zero costs regarding electricity consumption for all considered test cases) points of view.

show abstract