White patients’ physical responses to healthcare treatments are influenced by provider race and gender

Abstract

The healthcare workforce in the United States is becoming increasingly diverse, gradually shifting society away from the historical overrepresentation of White men among physicians. However, given the long-standing underrepresentation of people of color and women in the medical field, patients may still associate the concept of doctors with White men and may be physiologically less responsive to treatment administered by providers from other backgrounds. To investigate this, we varied the race and gender of the provider from which White patients received identical treatment for allergic reactions and measured patients’ improvement in response to this treatment, thus isolating how a provider’s demographic characteristics shape physical responses to healthcare. A total of 187 White patients experiencing a laboratory-induced allergic reaction interacted with a healthcare provider who applied a treatment cream and told them it would relieve their allergic reaction. Unbeknownst to the patients, the cream was inert (an unscented lotion) and interactions were completely standardized except for the provider’s race and gender. Patients were randomly assigned to interact with a provider who was a man or a woman and Asian, Black, or White. A fully blinded research assistant measured the change in the size of patients’ allergic reaction after cream administration. Results indicated that White patients showed a weaker response to the standardized treatment over time when it was administered by women or Black providers. We explore several potential explanations for these varied physiological treatment responses and discuss the implications of problematic race and gender dynamics that can endure “under the skin,” even for those who aim to be bias free.

‘It's not my greengrocer, it's someone from the medical profession’: A qualitative study regarding acceptability of deceptive and open‐label placebo prescribing in France

“…In addition, HCPs characteristics such as gender, age, communication style, tone of voice, personality factors, accents or perceived attractiveness might influence acceptability. Acceptability might be further complicated by dyadic factors relating to the particular configuration of patients with HCPs (Friesen & Blease, 2018; Howe et al, 2022).…”

We built this culture (so we can change it): Seven principles for intentional culture change.

“…The framework is grounded in the authors’ expertise in the social psychology of culture, bias, and inequality and their work applying evidence-based insights to inform and assess organizational, institutional, and societal change efforts in real-world settings. For over a decade, they have studied these change processes systematically in collaboration with researchers and private and public sector leaders in criminal justice (e.g., Camp et al, 2021, 2023; Hetey, 2020; Rho et al, 2023; Voigt et al, 2017), economic mobility (e.g., Cheryan & Markus, 2020; Lyons-Padilla et al, 2019; Thomas et al, 2020, 2023), education (e.g., Darling-Hammond et al, 2023; Okonofua et al, 2016; Stephens et al, 2019), health (e.g., Hook & Markus, 2020; Howe et al, 2022; Louis et al, 2022), media (e.g., Griffiths et al, 2023; Reddan et al, 2023), and technology (e.g., Zhao et al, 2023). The framework is centered around the behavioral change aspects of intentional culture change 2…”

Pills and potions: Mindsets influence our thoughts, behaviors, and physiologic responses to medications

“…Moreover, this effect was enhanced when the provider was warm and competent but negated when the provider was colder and less competent. In study 2, all participants were White and randomly assigned to interact with a male or female provider who was White, Asian, or Black 15 . Providers and patients were blinded to the true nature of the study.…”

“…Mindsets about the person providing the care also influences outcomes. 14,15 In two additional studies involving the histamine skin prick test, investigators altered expectations by manipulating the providers' perceived warmth and competence (study 1) and race and gender (study 2). Participants were told they were being screened for a food study and would need to be tested for allergies.…”

“…In study 2, all participants were White and randomly assigned to interact with a male or female provider who was White, Asian, or Black. 15 Providers and patients were blinded to the true nature of the study. The response to the inert antihistamine cream was substantially diminished when the provider was a female or Black.…”