2004
DOI: 10.2140/gtm.2004.7.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whitney towers and the Kontsevich integral

Abstract: We continue to develop an obstruction theory for embedding 2-spheres into 4-manifolds in terms of Whitney towers. The proposed intersection invariants take values in certain graded abelian groups generated by labelled trivalent trees, and with relations well known from the 3-dimensional theory of finite type invariants. Surprisingly, the same exact relations arise in 4 dimensions, for example the Jacobi (or IHX) relation comes in our context from the freedom of choosing Whitney arcs. We use the finite type the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intersection invariants for (twisted) Whitney towers. By [12,49], an order n (twisted) Whitney tower W built on properly immersed disks in the 4-ball has an intersection invariant τ n (W) (resp. τ n (W)) which is defined by associating unitrivalent trees to the unpaired higher-order intersection points (and twisted Whitney disks) in W (e.g.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intersection invariants for (twisted) Whitney towers. By [12,49], an order n (twisted) Whitney tower W built on properly immersed disks in the 4-ball has an intersection invariant τ n (W) (resp. τ n (W)) which is defined by associating unitrivalent trees to the unpaired higher-order intersection points (and twisted Whitney disks) in W (e.g.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Whitney tower obstruction theory of [49], the order n intersection invariant τ n (W) ∈ T n assigned to each order n (framed) Whitney tower W is defined by summing the trees associated to unpaired intersections in W (see Figure 2 for an example). The tree orientations are induced by Whitney disk orientations via a convention that corresponds to the AS relations (Section 2.5), and the IHX relations can be realized geometrically by controlled maneuvers on Whitney towers as described in [10,47].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the roots in t(g i ) will always correspond to i-labelled univalent vertices of t(W) when passing between gropes g i and a Whitney tower W on order zero surfaces A i . (These isomorphisms also preserve the signed trees associated to gropes and Whitney towers as in [6] and [21] Assume now that n ≥ 2. The proof will be completed by the following construction which shows how to decrease the order of g W while increasing the class of g W in a manner that preserves the tree t(g W ).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such enhancements are used in the obstruction theory of [20], [21], [22], and [23]. Notation in this paper has been chosen to be consistent with these papers where they overlap.…”
Section: Whitney Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the intersection and self‐intersection numbers λM,μM are considered as lying at order zero, whereas τM is of order one. There are invariants of all orders (with large indeterminacies in their target groups), defined in an inductive way, as described by Schneiderman and the fourth author [, Definition 9]. The idea is as follows: if some algebraic count of intersections vanishes, pair these intersections up by Whitney discs, and count how these new Whitney discs intersect the previous surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%