2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who are the stakeholders and how do they respond to a local government payments for ecosystem services program in a developed area: A case study from Suzhou, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The government is the regulator of cultivated land protection, representing the maximization of collective interests [49]. However, when the central government's compulsory land requirements conflict with local government goals of economic growth, the local government tends to behave opportunistically and requisition land unreasonably to attract investment and increase financial revenue.…”
Section: Stakeholders In Cultivated Land Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government is the regulator of cultivated land protection, representing the maximization of collective interests [49]. However, when the central government's compulsory land requirements conflict with local government goals of economic growth, the local government tends to behave opportunistically and requisition land unreasonably to attract investment and increase financial revenue.…”
Section: Stakeholders In Cultivated Land Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach required TVEs to concentrate in industrial parks and economic development zones [47,48]. Since 2000, a series of ecological and residential environment management initiatives have been carried out by the local government in rural areas echoing national policies, such as payments for ecosystem services and farmland eco-compensation schemes [49,50]. At the same time, developing rural tourism services was also encouraged to adjust and optimize rural industrial structures, extend the agricultural industrial chain, promote nonagricultural employment, and increase the incomes of villagers in rural areas with tourism resources [51].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If more PES programs were designed at the outset with the intention of evaluating their effectiveness (output-based), it would make a vital contribution toward filling the large gap in our knowledge about effective conservation investments and extrinsic motivations for contributing farmers' intrinsic motivations [17,36]. Although PES programs typically target a single service [28,58], the respondents in this study who had reached an educational level higher than high school would prefer to focus on bundled services. Unlike the outright purchase of land or permanent easements, many PES programs are short-term [16,33].…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For the Design Of Pes Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%