2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02359.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Compares to Whom? The Anatomy of Income Comparisons in Europe

Abstract: This article provides unprecedented direct evidence from large‐scale survey data on both the intensity (how much?) and direction (to whom?) of income comparisons. Income comparisons are considered to be at least somewhat important by three‐quarters of Europeans. They are associated with both lower levels of subjective well‐being and a greater demand for income redistribution. The rich compare less and are happier than average when they do, which latter is consistent with relative income theory. With respect to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
439
3
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 537 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
19
439
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Frey et al (2007) analyse data on life satisfaction and TV consumption in Europe and provide evidence that TV viewers are on average less satisfied with their financial situation even after controlling for actual income. Clark and Senik (2010a) is, to our knowledge, the only study which looks beyond TV and assesses the role of the internet technology. They find that respondents without internet access tend to attach less importance to income comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Frey et al (2007) analyse data on life satisfaction and TV consumption in Europe and provide evidence that TV viewers are on average less satisfied with their financial situation even after controlling for actual income. Clark and Senik (2010a) is, to our knowledge, the only study which looks beyond TV and assesses the role of the internet technology. They find that respondents without internet access tend to attach less importance to income comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither of them used individuals' concern at having a low relative income as a conciliator. Modern day evidence from econometric studies, experimental economics, social psychology, and neuroscience indicates that people routinely compare themselves with others who constitute their "comparison" or "reference" group, and that the negative outcome of upward comparisons (cf., for example, Andolfatto, 2002;Frey and Stutzer, 2002), impinges on their sense of wellbeing (Fliessbach et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2009;Clark and Senik, 2010). People are unhappy when their consumption, income, or social standing fall below those of others with whom they naturally compare themselves (those who constitute their "reference group").…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vast body of empirical research: For an overview, see Clark, et al (2008) and Frank and Heffetz (2011). European countries: Clark and Senik (2010). The intensity of social comparisons is estimated to be even higher in Japan (Clark, et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Economics Of Peace and Security Journal Issn 1749-852xmentioning
confidence: 99%