2016
DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1257597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who drives climate-relevant policies in the rising powers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both countries had more pressing priorities relating to economic development and energy shortages, but both were vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The same point was true in other large emerging economies where action on climate change has depended on how it is aligned with other domestic considerations (Schmitz, 2016). Today, the international architecture for governing climate change, in the form of the Paris Agreement, provides a clear recognition of the central importance of domestic politics in finding ways to balance climate change mitigation with other priorities, for both developed and developing countries.…”
Section: Constrained Responses To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both countries had more pressing priorities relating to economic development and energy shortages, but both were vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The same point was true in other large emerging economies where action on climate change has depended on how it is aligned with other domestic considerations (Schmitz, 2016). Today, the international architecture for governing climate change, in the form of the Paris Agreement, provides a clear recognition of the central importance of domestic politics in finding ways to balance climate change mitigation with other priorities, for both developed and developing countries.…”
Section: Constrained Responses To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Dubash and Khosla suggest that “co‐benefits as a concept has been extremely useful to India's political stance on climate change” (Dubash & Khosla, ) by providing a frame for reconciling environmental and developmental objectives. Schmitz reaches a similar conclusion, arguing that “the articulation of a co‐benefits approach has enabled stakeholders to engage in the climate change debate without conceding on their priority of accelerating economic development,” but also suggests that “other than the co‐benefits approach … no coherent strategy exists” (Schmitz, , p. 10). The concept has been seen as similarly valuable in China (Aunan, Fang, Vennemo, Oye, & Seip, ).…”
Section: Creative Manoeuvres To Overcome Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transformations in China are driven by a number of actors [63,64]. The change agents are different stakeholders in transformation, including laid-off workers, former plant owners, local government officials, scholars, NGOs, etc…”
Section: China Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, for an IPE audience, our exploration of the often-contested role of hydropower helps give meaning to broader debates over equity and sustainable development, governance, resource extraction, security, technology, centralization, climate change and the environment, policy and scale-political and policy discussions surrounding the provision of reliable, affordable, safe and environmentally benign energy services. At one level, these discussion revolve around the complex drivers behind energy investments in rising geopolitical powers such as Brazil, China, India and South Africa (Baker & Sovacool, 2017;Power, et al 2016;Schmitz, 2017) as well as changing regimes of energy finance (Di Muzio and Salah Ovadia, 2016). At another level, the debate is symbolic of future global struggles to simultaneously expand access to energy services while minimizing environmental degradation and ensuring sustainable development (Kuzemko, Keating, & Goldthau, 2016;Newell, 2018;Rafey & Sovacool, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%