2000
DOI: 10.1177/135676670000600304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who goes to events: A comparative analysis of the profile characteristics of visitors to four South Island events in New Zealand

Abstract: This paper presents a systematic comparative analysis of the profile characteristics of visitors to four events in the South Island of New Zealand in 1998: two food and beverage festivals, an air show and a country music festival. A comparative methodology for the study of events tourism is outlined and the results are presented in two stages; firstly, by means an element-by-element comparison of each of the characteristics; secondly, by way of a summary matrix. This comparative analysis emphasises the heterog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to match the needs of distinct groups of tourists effectively, many studies have been carried out to explore and/or determine the particular characteristics of tourists in a specific segment, or the similarities possessed by the tourists in a specific segment (Chen, 2003;Hudson, 2000;Koc, 2002Koc, , 2004Mok & Iverson, 2000;Nicholson & Pearce, 2000;Olsen, Warde, & Martens, 2000;Shoemaker, 1984Shoemaker, , 1989Shoemaker, 1994. In segmenting tourists, researchers have used prior (Hudson, 2000) and post hoc (May, Bastian, Taylor, & Whipple, 2001;Shoemaker, 1989) analyses.…”
Section: Seasonality and Segmentation In Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to match the needs of distinct groups of tourists effectively, many studies have been carried out to explore and/or determine the particular characteristics of tourists in a specific segment, or the similarities possessed by the tourists in a specific segment (Chen, 2003;Hudson, 2000;Koc, 2002Koc, , 2004Mok & Iverson, 2000;Nicholson & Pearce, 2000;Olsen, Warde, & Martens, 2000;Shoemaker, 1984Shoemaker, , 1989Shoemaker, 1994. In segmenting tourists, researchers have used prior (Hudson, 2000) and post hoc (May, Bastian, Taylor, & Whipple, 2001;Shoemaker, 1989) analyses.…”
Section: Seasonality and Segmentation In Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elimination and amalgamation of components are not overly surprising given event goers can exhibit different motivations at different events (Crompton & McKay, 1997;X. Li & Petrick, 2006;Nicholson & Pearce, 2000. To determine the factorability of the data, the KaiserMeyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and Bartelett's test of sphericity were checked.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, tourism marketing researchers have carried out various segmentation studies by using observable variables or unobservable variables such as demographic variables (Woodside & Pitts, 1976), travel activities (Tsang, Choi, & Tsang, 1999), benefits sought (Calantone & Johar, 1984;Yannopoulos & Rotenberg, 1999), and motivation (Crompton & McKay, 1997;Nicholson & Pearce, 2000). However, in order to effectively segment tourists in groups to understand and predict travel behaviors, a new construct-lifestyle-has been developed and utilized in marketing research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%