1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00051716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who has the opportunity to screen for oral cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of advances in diagnosis and treatment during the past 40 years, the overall 5-year survival rates for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers have improved only slightly and remained around 50%. 2,4 Guggenheimer et al 11 proposed three reasons for a delayed diagnosis of oral cancer: 1) patients at risk did not avail themselves for an examination, 2) oral examinations were not frequently being performed, and 3) the lesions were often overlooked. Although early detection and treatment improved the overall prognosis of oral cancer, delays from the onset of symptoms to clinical diagnosis were common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of advances in diagnosis and treatment during the past 40 years, the overall 5-year survival rates for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers have improved only slightly and remained around 50%. 2,4 Guggenheimer et al 11 proposed three reasons for a delayed diagnosis of oral cancer: 1) patients at risk did not avail themselves for an examination, 2) oral examinations were not frequently being performed, and 3) the lesions were often overlooked. Although early detection and treatment improved the overall prognosis of oral cancer, delays from the onset of symptoms to clinical diagnosis were common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of advances in diagnosis and treatment during the past 40 years, the overall 5-year survival rates for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers have improved only slightly and remained around 50%. , [6] Guggenheimer et al [7] proposed three reasons for a delayed diagnosis of oral cancer: 1) patients at risk did not avail themselves for an examination, 2) oral examinations were not frequently being performed, and 3) the lesions were often overlooked. Although early detection and treatment improved the overall prognosis of oral cancer, delays from the onset of symptoms to clinical diagnosis were common.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies comparing GPs and dentists in knowledge of oral cancer, pre-malignant lesions, risk factors and oral examination skills and habits indicate dentists are more likely to examine the oral cavity routinely although in one study 94% of GPs did in response to oral soreness. 44,45 On the other hand, some argue 57 that 'the medical practitioner is the most likely resource' for oral cancer screening as doctors are more likely to encounter at-risk patients because of co-existing medical conditions.…”
Section: Stage On Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%