OBJECTIVE:To describe the prevalence of benzodiazepine use, sociodemographic and physical health factors associated with use, dosages taken, and directions for use among individuals aged 65 years and older. DESIGN:Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the community-based, prospective observational Cardiovascular Health Study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Medicare eligibility lists from four U.S. communities were used to recruit a representative sample of 5,201 community-dwelling elderly, of which 5,181 participants met all study criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Among participants, 511 (9.9%) were taking at least one benzodiazepine, primarily anxiolytics (73%). Benzodiazepines were often prescribed to be taken pro re nata (PRN "as needed"), and 36.5% of prescriptions with instructions to be taken regularly were taken at a dose lower than prescribed. Reported over-the-counter (OTC) sleep aid medication use was 39.2% in benzodiazepine users and 3.3% in nonusers. In a multivariate logistic model, the significant independent correlates of benzodiazepine use were being white (odds ratio [

No abstract

Although the CEX is a valuable didactic tool, its psychometric properties preclude reliable assessment of clinical skills as a one-time observation.

No abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of triazolam, 0.25 mg, after the administration of the marketed oral tablet and a sublingual prototype wafer; an intravenous dose was used as a reference. Twelve men were evaluated in a three-way crossover study; study days were separated by 1 week. A single dose was administered to each subject at approximately 8 a.m.; serial blood samples were obtained for the determination of triazolam concentration. The fraction absorbed relative to intravenous was 20% higher in the sublingual than in the oral treatment (p = 0.0128); the difference between treatments was greatest in the first 2 hours as indicated by the area under the curve from 0 to 2 hours (p < 0.05). The extraction ratio ranged from 0.05 to 0.25, and the predicted availability after oral administration was 86% with a range of 75 to 95%. In contrast, the observed mean absolute availability was 44% (oral) and 53% (sublingual). A potential explanation for this discrepancy between predicted and observed bioavailability is that after oral administration, a fraction of triazolam may be metabolized by cytochrome P450IIIA4 in the gut wall, with a separate fraction subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Although this study was not designed to identify sites of triazolam metabolism, the proposed explanation is consistent with the occurrence of P450IIIA4 in the stomach, small intestine, and liver. Doses administered sublingually avoid first-pass metabolism, producing earlier and higher peak concentrations than do doses administered orally.