Who is contributing? Scientific collaborations  on COVID-19

Duan, Dezhong; Chen, Ying; Zhang, Yang

doi:10.1177/0308518x20931105

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most countries/regions regard the US as the strongest scientific partner. Thirdly, China has played a vital role in the scientific research and cooperation on COVID‐19, which is not only reflected in the number of published papers (Duan et al ., 2020) but also in its extensive international cooperation (Mo & Zhou, 2020; Wu et al ., 2020; Zhou et al ., 2020). Fourth, China and the US were the closest partners in the current international scientific cooperation of COVID‐19.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It took only 6 months from the discovery of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID‐19) to more than 6 million confirmed cases and 300,000 deaths, which not only proves that the COVID‐19 is too contagious to be overcome but also demonstrates the common destiny of all countries and regions in the era of globalization (Nature Editorial, 2020c; Washington, 2020). In fact, when this outbreak was declared as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 30 January 2020 by the WHO, it was already indicated that international cooperation is the key to combating this pandemic (Berkley, 2020; Duan et al ., 2020; Nature Editorial, 2020a, 2020b; Nature Medicine Editorial, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis

Duan

Xia

2021

Learned Publishing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers the pattens of international collaboration by analysing publications on COVID‐19 published in the first 6 months of the pandemic. The data set comprised articles on COVID‐19 indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) downloaded four times between 1 April 2020 and 1 June 2020. The analysis of 5,827 documents revealed that 128 countries, 23,127 authors, and 6,349 institutes published on the pandemic. The data reveal that the three main publishing countries were the USA, China, and England with Italy closely following. Although publication was widely spread, most of the institutions with the highest volume of output were in China. Network analysis showed growth in international cooperation with an average degree of country/region cooperation rising to 23.06 by 1 June. There was also a clear core‐periphery structure to international collaboration. Institutional collaboration was shown to be highly regionalized. The data reveal a high and growing incidence of international collaboration on the pandemic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis

Duan

Xia

2021

Learned Publishing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the data gathered on 15 April 2020, 1,265 article reviews and letters were jointly published by 1,608 institutions in 752 cities from 84 countries. When it comes to cooperation, 77 countries (regions) have cooperated internationally 1,180 times, 354 cities have cooperated 2,052 times, and 1,495 institutes have conducted 7,192 institutional collaborations (Duan et al 2020). Another example of cooperation at the state level is where several countries have sent medical equipment to Indonesia.…”

Section: Global Solidarity and Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19: Nationalism and global solidarities

Pratiwi

Tsauro

2021

MKP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the COVID-19 crisis emerged, many forms of nationalism have been rising, such as racism, state individualism, vaccine nationalism, and so forth. However, this kind of nationalism cannot solve the global pandemic that affects various aspects of human life that needs global solidarity in the framework of thinking. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between COVID-19, nationalism, and global solidarity. This article used the literature review method to compare and contrast the COVID-19, Nationalism, and Global Solidarity arguments by using reputable resources such as journals, research reports, and news articles. This article was divided into three sections: 1) the explanation about nationalism, its definition, and theoretical approach, 2) state and nationalism in crisis time, 3) cooperation and global solidarity. It concluded that the COVID-19 period showed us people tend to have greater individuality and higher attachment to their groups and state, as Social Identity Theory (SIT) suggests. It manifested in state nationalist view that state as the sole player in mitigating this pandemic shows selfish attitude. However, as the COVID-19 served as a global pandemic, it also needs global solidarity which has been proven in solving the spread of coronavirus and tackle its impact.

show abstract

“…Previous studies have explored how to prevent and control the spread of the epidemic from multiple perspectives, including public health management (8), clinical features and pathological mechanism research (9,10), vaccines and diagnostic methods (11,12), transmission models (13), the auxiliary application of information technology (14) and international cooperation (15). With respect to research literatures on international cooperation, many literatures emphasized that scientific collaboration in the field of health plays an important role in reducing the infection rate and mortality of infectious diseases (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). In addition, some literatures analyzed the prevention and control of infectious diseases from the perspective of the construction of global health governance mechanisms (21,22).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does It Matter to Establish a Strategic Partnership for COVID-19 Prevention and Control? The Perspective of Multiple Distances in Emerging Economies

Zhao

Wei

Chen

et al. 2022

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 has impacted the politics, economy and society of countries around the world. The public health diplomacy system through which developed countries in Europe and America used to provide vertical one-way assistance to developing countries faces huge challenges. How emerging economies can cooperate to fight the pandemic on the basis of mutual trust and mutual benefit has become an urgent issue. In this paper, we examine the impact of political mutual trust on the effectiveness of pandemic prevention and control from the perspective of establishing strategic partnerships between emerging economies. Furthermore, taking into account the huge differences between emerging economies, this paper explores institutional distance, cultural distance, and geographical distance—the adjustment effect of the control effect. Studies have shown that the improvement of political mutual trust is conducive to the formation of a community of shared futures between countries and has a positive effect on curbing the spread of the pandemic. The increase of the three-dimensional distance of institutions, culture, and geography will weaken the effect of establishing strategic partners for pandemic prevention and control. This paper explores a new model of horizontal international cooperation among emerging economies, and provides a reference for emerging economies to deal with common globalization issues in the future.

show abstract

Who is contributing? Scientific collaborations on COVID-19

Cited by 9 publications

References 7 publications

Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis

Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis

COVID-19: Nationalism and global solidarities

Does It Matter to Establish a Strategic Partnership for COVID-19 Prevention and Control? The Perspective of Multiple Distances in Emerging Economies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About