2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32827-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Is the Volk? PEGIDA and the Contested Memory of 1989 on Social Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The past is a powerful tool of political mobilisation for right‐wing leaders and parties, which base much of their discourse on tropes of tradition, nostalgia, and (gone) national glory. At the same time, the far right is best placed to benefit from the ‘memory fluidity’ that has characterised European (and more generally Western) politics in recent years – whereby many of the established ideational signposts underpinning the post‐World War II, and later post‐Cold War order are increasingly questioned, reassessed, reformulated and at times straight out falsified (Couperus & Tortola, 2019; Jaskulowski & Majewski, 2022; Joly, 2022; Richardson‐Little & Merrill, 2020; Rueda, 2022). In particular, the (ab)use of the past seems to have an important two‐way role in the so‐called mainstreaming of the far right, whereby the latter both capitalises on and encourages, the contestation and revision of events and chapters of the ‘dark past’ – and in particular those linked to the experiences of fascism, war and colonialism (Couperus & Tortola, 2019; Pasieka, 2021; Pető, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past is a powerful tool of political mobilisation for right‐wing leaders and parties, which base much of their discourse on tropes of tradition, nostalgia, and (gone) national glory. At the same time, the far right is best placed to benefit from the ‘memory fluidity’ that has characterised European (and more generally Western) politics in recent years – whereby many of the established ideational signposts underpinning the post‐World War II, and later post‐Cold War order are increasingly questioned, reassessed, reformulated and at times straight out falsified (Couperus & Tortola, 2019; Jaskulowski & Majewski, 2022; Joly, 2022; Richardson‐Little & Merrill, 2020; Rueda, 2022). In particular, the (ab)use of the past seems to have an important two‐way role in the so‐called mainstreaming of the far right, whereby the latter both capitalises on and encourages, the contestation and revision of events and chapters of the ‘dark past’ – and in particular those linked to the experiences of fascism, war and colonialism (Couperus & Tortola, 2019; Pasieka, 2021; Pető, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of right-wing social movements, some even make use of symbolism and similarities. PEGIDA, for instance, adapted the Montagsdemos (Monday protests), popular prior to the fall of the GDR, even using the slogan 'we are the people' (wir sind das Volk), online and offline (Richardson-Little & Merrill, 2020). Polish groups such as Młodzież Wszechpolska (All-Polish Youth), Roty Marszu Niepodległości (Independence March) and their key figure Robert Bąkiewicz adapt symbolism around Polish resistance during World War II.…”
Section: Social Movement Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship has addressed how German far-right and radical-right populist actors, including the AfD, have mobilized and revised memory of World War II and the Holocaust (see Audretsch and Gatzka, 2020;Bender, 2021;Deodhar, 2021;Schmalenberger, 2021). Researchers have also started to interrogate how such actors approach GDR memory (see Göpffarth, 2021;Richardson-Little and Merrill, 2020;Sabrow, 2019;Volk, 2020;Wüstenberg, 2019). Much of this research has stressed how different German far-right actors' instrumentalization of the past has led to mnemonic conflicts about 'the "correct" way to interpret the past' (Zerubavel, 1996: 295) that have fractured what was otherwise a generally unified public German 'memory regime' -even if the commemorative consensus surrounding World War II and the Holocaust is arguably stronger than that which surrounds GDR-related events (see Art, 2014;Kubik and Bernhard, 2014;Volk, 2020).…”
Section: German Far-right Political Memory and Social Media Commemora...mentioning
confidence: 99%