2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who knows who - Inverting the Social Force Model for finding groups

Abstract: Social groups based on friendship or family relations are very common phenomena in human crowds and a valuable cue for a crowd activity recognition system. In this paper we present an algorithm for automatic on-line inference of social groups from observed trajectories of individual people. The method is based on the Social Force Model (SFM)widely used in crowd simulation applications -which specifies several attractive and repulsive forces influencing each individual relative to the other pedestrians and thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, this model has been extended for dealing with groups [6]. Sochman and Hogg [25], on the other hand, propose a new agglomerative clustering method for group detection by inverting the SFM to infer its hidden parameters given tracking observations. Similarly, Ge et al [10] use agglomerative clustering to group together tracking trajectories gathered in a time-window with fixed length.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, this model has been extended for dealing with groups [6]. Sochman and Hogg [25], on the other hand, propose a new agglomerative clustering method for group detection by inverting the SFM to infer its hidden parameters given tracking observations. Similarly, Ge et al [10] use agglomerative clustering to group together tracking trajectories gathered in a time-window with fixed length.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the works addressing the analysis of group behaviour, it is interesting to highlight the differences between 2 classes of methods, i.e., those considering only positional features at each time step [13,21] (e.g., the ground floor position), and those processing visual data over a time-window [3,10,25,28] (e.g., exploiting trajectories). The former provides the results at each time frame with no delay.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of moving particles in the same group should be zero [18]. We will use spectral clustering method to obtain the particle group information.…”
Section: Particle Group Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some work in computer vision [3][11] [24][28] has explored group discovery and group tracking, while our work focuses on using social groups to maintain individual identities in a DAT framework. T1 T2 T3 T5 T4 T6 T7 T8 T1 T2 T3 T5 T4 T6 T7 T8 Confident Tracklets T1-T3 T2-T3 T4-T6 T6-T7 T7-T8 g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 T2-T3 g2 T7-T8 g3 T1-T3 T2-T3 T4-T6 T6-T7 T7-T8 g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 Group Tracking…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%