Who May Represent the Country? Football, Citizenship, Migration, and National Identity at the FIFA World Cup

Abstract

The terms 'citizenship', 'nation', and 'nationality' contain different, albeit overlapping, meanings of belonging and identity. The history of the FIFA (F ed eration Internationale de Football Association) World Cup provides excellent examples and cases to unveil these meanings in different historical contexts. Three overlapping categories of historical realities are proposed to understand the historical complexities of migration, citizenship and national identity from a historical sports perspective. The first category considers diaspora teams, using the examples of Italy in 1934 and Morocco in 2018. The second category examines teams from expanding and dissolving states, exemplified by Germany in 1938 and Yugoslavia in 1990. The third category explores colonial and post-colonial realities, illustrated by Portugal in 1966 and France in 2018. The relationship among national belonging, citizenship, and migration challenges the self-evident notions of membership and belonging. The historical concepts of ius sanguinis (blood ties) and ius soli (territorial birthright) are well-known markers and symbols of national belonging and citizenship. In nation states, the feeling of belonging is created by membership in an 'imagined community', which is often self-evidently bound by these markers. The proposed historical categories partly legitimize and pave the way for diaspora and post-colonial football players who will become more visible in national teams at the World Cup in the future.

Soccer’s AI transformation: deep learning’s analysis of soccer’s pandemic research evolution

“…Nevertheless, soccer studies that addressed sex and gender, such as the perceptions and gender roles of female soccer players and the attitudes and impact of LGBTQ fans, were identified in both periods ( Petty and Pope, 2019 ; Bevan et al, 2021 ; Kossakowski and Besta, 2022 ; Mikkonen, 2022 ). In addition, studies exploring fans’ political behaviors, attitudes, projected national identities, and ideologies in relation to soccer were also deeply sociological ( Tamir, 2019 ; Baltas, 2021 ; Oonk, 2021 ; Webber, 2022 ) and have been noted as thematic issues across both periods.…”

A Legal Certainty of Dual Citizenship for Possession of Land

“…The firmness of who the original Indonesians are as regulated in Article 2 of the Citizenship Law along with its explanation which has clarified and confirmed the position and legal certainty for every Indonesian citizen who, since his birth in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, has never received another citizenship of his own free will is in line with the firmness regulated in the provisions of Article 26 paragraph (1) and Article 6 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which is an integral part of Law Number 3 of 1946 concerning Citizens and Residents of Citizens so that at the constitutional juridical level the interpretation of the meaning of "Original" becomes clearer (Christianto, 2020). The principles adopted in the General Elucidation of the Citizenship Law are emphasized as follows: 1) The ius sanguinis (law of the blood) principle is the principle that determines a person's citizenship based on descent, not based on the country of birth; 2) The principle ius soli (law of the soil) principle is the principle that determines a person's nationality based on the country of birth, which is limited to children following the provisions stipulated in this law; 3) The principle of single citizenship is the principle that determines one citizenship for each person; and 4) The principle of limited dual citizenship is the principle that determines dual citizenship for children following the provisions stipulated in this law (Oonk, 2021).…”

Media representations of naturalized athletes: Sentiment variations and trends in Turkish media

“…The absence of a “genuine” link (Jansen, 2019; Shachar, 2011) between the athlete and the State can make the representation controversial, sparking debates both nationally and internationally. Not only in sport studies, naturalized athletes have also captured the attention of various research areas such as citizenship (Jansen et al, 2018; Oonk, 2020, 2021; Reiche and Tinaz, 2019), law and migration (Shachar, 2011; Shachar and Hirschl, 2013; van Campenhout et al, 2019; Wollmann et al, 2015), and media studies and sociology (Chiba et al, 2001; Chiu, 2021; Jansen, 2019; Jansen and Skey, 2020; Shin et al, 2022; Shor and Yonay, 2010; Yung et al, 2021). Crucially, this interaction has inspired more interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomenon.…”