2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended entry points to the literature are [10,[12][13][14]. Recent country-specific entry points to the literature are: Germany [10,14], Denmark [15,16], Belgium [17], Sweden [18,19], UK [20], Finland [21], Spain [22], Italy [23], Austria [24,25], France [26], Netherlands [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recommended entry points to the literature are [10,[12][13][14]. Recent country-specific entry points to the literature are: Germany [10,14], Denmark [15,16], Belgium [17], Sweden [18,19], UK [20], Finland [21], Spain [22], Italy [23], Austria [24,25], France [26], Netherlands [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the embargo, Denmark began to shift away from fossil fuels in order to promote energy security [40]. Collective anti-nuclear networks formed the basis for cooperatives [15]. Geographically, Denmark has abundant wind resources, and wind cooperatives were successful in bringing the costs of turbines down and generating public acceptance of renewable energy.…”
Section: Denmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After such a change, the self-consumed wind power should be cheaper than the purchased wind power. Changes in e.g., ownership regulation, spatial planning regulation, the size of wind projects, and the social normative perception of wind power have been identified as causes for the lowering of Changes in e.g., ownership regulation, spatial planning regulation, the size of wind projects, and the social normative perception of wind power have been identified as causes for the lowering of wind projects with local and inclusive ownership in Denmark [11,62]. On top of that, the abolition of feed-in tariffs in 2018 and the implementation of the tender scheme introduces an extra burden and increased risk for (small) local initiatives [18,19] and could reduce their number even further.…”
Section: The Design Of the Electricity Spot Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperling [17] used Samsø as a case to show how an energy transition is carried out, stressing the importance of "intensive processes of sensing and priming linked to the [3] local population" in terms of ensuring that the transition projects are anchored locally. Likewise, Mey & Diesendorf [18] investigate community renewable energy projects in Denmark using Samsø as a case, finding amongst others that "shared identification and objectives that go beyond environmental and technology motivations" have been for instrumental for action on such projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%