2002
DOI: 10.1080/10486800208568686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who reacts when, how and upon what: From audience surveys to the theatrical event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Controls. Because visitors' expectations may influence their evaluation of a theatrical event (Boorsma & van Maanen, 2003;DiMaggio, Useem, & Brown, 1978;Sauter, 2002;Thompson, 2006), we included variables that may affect expectations as controls. Accordingly, we surveyed participants' age, gender, and educational attainment.…”
Section: Methods Developing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controls. Because visitors' expectations may influence their evaluation of a theatrical event (Boorsma & van Maanen, 2003;DiMaggio, Useem, & Brown, 1978;Sauter, 2002;Thompson, 2006), we included variables that may affect expectations as controls. Accordingly, we surveyed participants' age, gender, and educational attainment.…”
Section: Methods Developing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arts attenders might all be engaged in a similar search for performance quality (Sauter, 2002), but their responsiveness to the other factors which underpin audience development and marketing -including venue, accessibility, preference and social experience -is variable and unpredictable. Seeing any arts event too much from one end of the transaction/commitment continuum could blind both researchers and arts organisations to the varied experiences within an audience, and particularly to the strategies which might help to extend audiences beyond those who already have an established relationship with an event or venue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in separate art forms have identified distinctive features of dance (Reason & Reynolds, 2010), theatre (Sauter, 2002) and opera audiences (Jobst & Boerner, 2011), and yet have generated overarching themes: quality of art and connection with performers emerge as the strongest factors in audience satisfaction (Sauter, 2002), with the peripheral aspects of venue comfort and friendliness having least overall effect (Jobst & Boerner, 2011), but helping to mitigate the risk of attending an unfamiliar work in a familiar setting (Maitland, 2000). By conducting a cross-arts audience survey within one UK city, this project looked at different audiences' experiences in a small range of venues, exploring the variables of attendance habits, motivation and attitude across a local population before investigating these in greater depth through interviews and focus groups with first-time and frequent attenders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Makroströmung der Rezeptionsforschung geht davon aus, dass verschiedene Zuschauer(-gruppen) dasselbe Theaterereignis sehr unterschiedlich wahrnehmen und unterschiedlich bewerten (z.B. KOTLER & SCHEFF 2007;SAUTER 2002). Freshwater (2009: 5 f.) schreibt dazu:…”
Section: Forschungslücke Und Annahmenunclassified