Who’s afraid of the X? Incorporating the X and Y chromosomes into the analysis of DNA methylation array data

Abstract

Background Many human disease phenotypes manifest differently by sex, making the development of methods for incorporating X and Y-chromosome data into analyses vital. Unfortunately, X and Y chromosome data are frequently excluded from large-scale analyses of the human genome and epigenome due to analytical complexity associated with sex chromosome dosage differences between XX and XY individuals, and the impact of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) on the epigenome. As such, little attention has been given to considering the methods by which sex chromosome data may be included in analyses of DNA methylation (DNAme) array data. Results With Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 DNAme array data from 634 placental samples, we investigated the effects of probe filtering, normalization, and batch correction on DNAme data from the X and Y chromosomes. Processing steps were evaluated in both mixed-sex and sex-stratified subsets of the analysis cohort to identify whether including both sexes impacted processing results. We found that identification of probes that have a high detection p-value, or that are non-variable, should be performed in sex-stratified data subsets to avoid over- and under-estimation of the quantity of probes eligible for removal, respectively. All normalization techniques investigated returned X and Y DNAme data that were highly correlated with the raw data from the same samples. We found no difference in batch correction results after application to mixed-sex or sex-stratified cohorts. Additionally, we identify two analytical methods suitable for XY chromosome data, the choice between which should be guided by the research question of interest, and we performed a proof-of-concept analysis studying differential DNAme on the X and Y chromosome in the context of placental acute chorioamnionitis. Finally, we provide an annotation of probe types that may be desirable to filter in X and Y chromosome analyses, including probes in repetitive elements, the X-transposed region, and cancer-testis gene promoters. Conclusion While there may be no single “best” approach for analyzing DNAme array data from the X and Y chromosome, analysts must consider key factors during processing and analysis of sex chromosome data to accommodate the underlying biology of these chromosomes, and the technical limitations of DNA methylation arrays.

DNA-Methylation Signatures of Tobacco Smoking in a High Cardiovascular Risk Population: Modulation by the Mediterranean Diet

“…In the current EWAS, analysis is typically limited to autosomal chromosomes, and sex chromosomes are frequently overlooked. This is primarily due to the analytical complexities associated with sex chromosome dosage differences between XX and XY individuals, as well as the effect of X-chromosome inactivation on the epigenome [ 117 , 118 ]. However, there is an increasing interest in these chromosomes, and we have obtained some preliminary results in this population.…”

Climate change, age acceleration, and the erosion of fitness in polar bears

“…Sequences that bind multiple times can confound methylation signals coming from multiple sites at once 6 . Methylation can also vary by sex if CpG sequences are located on the sex chromosomes 7 , a particularly important concern for the mammalian array because of species-specific locations of CpG sequences on chromosomes.…”

Pre-diagnosis blood DNA methylation profiling of twin pairs discordant for breast cancer points to the importance of environmental risk

“…All samples that met all the above criteria passed the quality control. In addition, ambiguous mapping and poor-quality probes based on Zhou et al (2017, [40]) and probes binding to sex chromosomes were removed to address ambiguity of the DNAm signal based on X-chromosome inactivation [41,42]. Following the quality control, the DNAm data underwent preprocessing in two separate batches due to use of two different types of microarray platforms, EPIC and 450K.…”