2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73546-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who’s in Charge?—Dealing with the Self-regulation Dilemma in Digital Learning Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most importantly, the perceived obstacle of low self-regulation skills led to a less frequent implementation of digital learning in special education. This is in line with previous findings regarding the role of self-regulation in digital learning (Song, Kalet, and Plass 2016), indicating that higher self-regulation leads to improved learning outcomes (Bergamin and Hirt 2018;Hromalik and Koszalka 2018). On the other end of the scales, low self-regulation skills might lead to less effective digital learning processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most importantly, the perceived obstacle of low self-regulation skills led to a less frequent implementation of digital learning in special education. This is in line with previous findings regarding the role of self-regulation in digital learning (Song, Kalet, and Plass 2016), indicating that higher self-regulation leads to improved learning outcomes (Bergamin and Hirt 2018;Hromalik and Koszalka 2018). On the other end of the scales, low self-regulation skills might lead to less effective digital learning processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies described comparatively low self-regulation skills of students with learning and/or behavioural difficulties (Grigorenko et al 2020;Nelson et al 2004). It may be expected that a (mis)match between self-regulatory skills and the prerequisites of digital learning would either promote, or hinder, digital learning (Bergamin and Hirt 2018;Hromalik and Koszalka 2018).…”
Section: Explaining the Intention To Implement Digital Learning For Students With Learning And/or Behavioural Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work within the KLI framework has investigated how practices interact and which combination of practices are most appropriate (Koedinger et al, 2013), as well as applying KLI principles to the study of new environments such as massive online open courses (Koedinger et al, 2016). Work using KLI has extended well beyond the original team that developed KLI (e.g., Bergamin & Hirt, 2018;Borracci et al, 2020).…”
Section: Learning Engineering: Past Successesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students can generate personalized learning plans based on the intelligent teaching system, independently select learning content, arrange learning progress, and carry out group cooperative learning (Fang et al, 2019;Walkington & Bernacki, 2020;Yilmaz, 2018). Individualized learning methods have higher requirements for students' self-regulation and self-management level (Bergamin & Hirt, 2018;Tseng, Yi, & Yeh, 2019), so teachers should also pay attention to the cultivation of students' independent learning ability in the teaching process.…”
Section: Challenges Of Ai In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%