2018
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who stays in addiction treatment groups? Anxiety and avoidant attachment styles predict treatment retention and relapse

Abstract: Attachment styles have been shown to be an important predictor of relationship quality and well-being. They have also been linked with ability to function well in groups. Insecure attachment styles are thought to be an underlying cause of addiction and represent a target for change in one-to-one therapy. How attachment styles themselves affect group therapy for addiction is understudied. The current study addresses this gap by examining the effects of attachment styles on relapse and treatment retention amongs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides evidence to support previous research that argued for the existence of negative outcomes from problematic SNS use (Kraut et al, 1998). The current findings fit with the assumption that avoidantly-attached individuals could be more likely to use social media more abundantly to alleviate feelings of loneliness (Bessi ere et al, 2008), counteracting assumptions that social connectedness is not desired by avoidantly-attached individuals due to fear of disclosure and feeling undeserving (see Marshall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This study provides evidence to support previous research that argued for the existence of negative outcomes from problematic SNS use (Kraut et al, 1998). The current findings fit with the assumption that avoidantly-attached individuals could be more likely to use social media more abundantly to alleviate feelings of loneliness (Bessi ere et al, 2008), counteracting assumptions that social connectedness is not desired by avoidantly-attached individuals due to fear of disclosure and feeling undeserving (see Marshall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is also possible that self-selection biases in treatment choice might have also influenced study findings. Recent research shows that attachment styles might predispose people towards particular forms of treatment, making them more likely to engage with others in that particular treatment context (Marshall, Albery, & Frings, 2018). The implication for the present study is that individual differences might be a factor in people's readiness to engage with others in the treatment community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Despite a wide range of work supporting SIMCM, and the role of identity in addiction recovery more generally, less is known how social identification with groups such as AA change over timeparticularly during important transitions in the recovery journey, such as initial engagement with groups, or the period around lapses or relapses (a limited duration or consistent return to drinking behaviours respectivelyboth common features of the recovery process - Scott et al, 2005). Understanding such changes may provide insight into why not all individuals continue to attend group sessions (important as lower attendance is linked with poorer outcomes; Gossop et al, 2003;Marshall et al, 2018) and why long term outcomes in extended addiction recovery vary between individuals.…”
Section: Social Identities Across Timementioning
confidence: 99%