2010
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression

Abstract: Recently, both increases and decreases in resting-state functional connectivity have been found in major depression. However, these studies only assessed functional connectivity within a specific network or between a few regions of interest, while comorbidity and use of medication was not always controlled for. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whole-brain functional connectivity, unbiased by a priori definition of regions or networks of interest, in medication-free depressive patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
315
10
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(363 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
36
315
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the previous behavioural, electroencephalogram and functional activation findings of dysfunctional negative emotional processing in individuals with MDD, 7,8,50,51 our finding of decreased amygdala-PFC functional connectivity during fearful face processing and not during happy or neutral face processing supports the involvement of abnormalities in amygdala-PFC functional connectivity in negative emotional processing in individuals with MDD, and it further implicates abnormal negative emotional processing in the neuropathophysiology of MDD. Taken together with the findings of our recent report of decreased amygdala-PFC functional connectivity during a resting -state fMRI in individuals with MDD, 19 our current findings suggest that altered amygdala-PFC functional connectivity may be a key feature of the disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the previous behavioural, electroencephalogram and functional activation findings of dysfunctional negative emotional processing in individuals with MDD, 7,8,50,51 our finding of decreased amygdala-PFC functional connectivity during fearful face processing and not during happy or neutral face processing supports the involvement of abnormalities in amygdala-PFC functional connectivity in negative emotional processing in individuals with MDD, and it further implicates abnormal negative emotional processing in the neuropathophysiology of MDD. Taken together with the findings of our recent report of decreased amygdala-PFC functional connectivity during a resting -state fMRI in individuals with MDD, 19 our current findings suggest that altered amygdala-PFC functional connectivity may be a key feature of the disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…5 Other groups have demonstrated excessive responses of the amygdala to negative emotion, especially fearful facial expressions, in medicated individuals with MDD. 7,8 Studies of the role of the PFC suggest that functional imbalance between the left and right PFC in emotion processing may also be involved in the neuropathophysiology of MDD. 9 Consistent with this idea, lesions in the left PFC and left PFC dysfunction, which lead to deficits in the capacity to experience positive affect, a key feature of depression, have been reported in association with depression, 10,11 particularly during negative emotion processing, 12 possibly indicating greater dysfunction in the left than the right PFC in individuals with MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results support the possibility that DMN-sgACC hyperconnectivity might underlie depressive rumination (20). Second, several studies reported decreased resting-state connectivity within the cognitive control network in adult patients with MDD (21)(22)(23). In line with this evidence, MDD has been conceptualized as an imbalance between the DMN and the cognitive control network (24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Additional components were identified after visual inspection. Names for each RSN were assigned by means of visual comparison to published data (22,(51)(52)(53)(54) …”
Section: Physiological Noise Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%