2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole Genome and Exome Sequencing of Monozygotic Twins with Trisomy 21, Discordant for a Congenital Heart Defect and Epilepsy

Abstract: Congenital heart defects (CHD) occur in 40% of patients with trisomy 21, while the other 60% have a structurally normal heart. This suggests that the increased dosage of genes on chromosome 21 is a risk factor for abnormal heart development. Interaction of genes on chromosome 21 or their gene products with certain alleles of genes on other chromosomes could contribute to CHD. Here, we identified a pair of monozygotic twins with trisomy 21 but discordant for a ventricular septal defect and epilepsy. Twin-zygosi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this mechanism, during the somatic cell division, additional genetic alterations are introduced as a second‐hit, which influences the phenotypic manifestation of the syndrome. However, it appears that not all phenotypic discordance is explained by somatic mosaicism as demonstrated by the failure of identifying a mutation explaining the phenotypic spectrum of monozygotic Down syndrome twins by whole genome and exome sequencing [Chaiyasap et al, ]. In our patient, somatic mosaicism for the disease causing mutation can be ruled out, but we cannot rule out a second, mosaic mutation in the genome that occurred in only one twin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this mechanism, during the somatic cell division, additional genetic alterations are introduced as a second‐hit, which influences the phenotypic manifestation of the syndrome. However, it appears that not all phenotypic discordance is explained by somatic mosaicism as demonstrated by the failure of identifying a mutation explaining the phenotypic spectrum of monozygotic Down syndrome twins by whole genome and exome sequencing [Chaiyasap et al, ]. In our patient, somatic mosaicism for the disease causing mutation can be ruled out, but we cannot rule out a second, mosaic mutation in the genome that occurred in only one twin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The invalidation of the selected discordant variants in the present study was consistent with previous similar studies. The studies by Baranzini et al (31), Chaiyasap et al (32) and Solomon et al (33) did not identify any discordant variants in monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis, congenital heart defect or vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies and limb abnormalities, respectively. By contrast, Reumers et al (30) and Tang et al (18) identified discordant variants in the monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is possible that the sequencing coverage of the present study had no sufficient power to identify de novo variants linked with SLE. ii) DNA in leukocytes may not be an ideal sample for studying monozygotic twins discordant for phenotypes (32,35). In pregnancy, most monozygotic twins are monochorionic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some discordant pairs, no nucleotide sequencing differences were found by next‐generation sequencing. Conversely, copy number and point mutations were identified in concordant adult MZ twins; however, the estimated mutation rate of 1.2 × 10 −7 per base pair per twin pair makes the biological significance of these nucleotide differences unclear . While these reports do not provide evidence specifically for fission or fusion, they underscore the complexity of the biological milieu surrounding the twinning event—or sequence of events—and subsequent development of the cotwins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%