2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole genome sequencing to characterize shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26 in a public health setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internationally, several studies have revealed a broad diversity of genomic patterns among STEC strains [32,47,[71][72][73]. As far as we know, the present study is the first to analyze genomic patterns of STEC strains circulating in South America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Internationally, several studies have revealed a broad diversity of genomic patterns among STEC strains [32,47,[71][72][73]. As far as we know, the present study is the first to analyze genomic patterns of STEC strains circulating in South America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Plasmids, bacteriophages, transposons, pathogenicity islands, insertion sequences (mobile genetic elements-MGEs) plays important roles in the genomic plasticity of E. coli [15]. Whole genome sequencing is considered the gold standard technique which can accurately serotype strains and evaluate relatedness among isolates based on differences in gene content or allelic variation [16][17][18][19]. This technique revealed that E. coli presents a conserved core of genes (common to pathogenic and commensal strains as well) that acquired, by horizontal gene transfer, small cluster of genes and genomic islands associated with virulence [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still considered as the gold standard. However, development and access to the next-generation sequencing techniques have caused the analysis of differences in DNA, including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), to gain popularity [34][35][36] and it can be assumed that in the near future, these techniques will replace PFGE. Both these approaches (PFGE and sequencing), although guaranteed to obtain accurate and unequivocal results (especially in the case of sequencing), are expensive and time-consuming and their performance requires access to the specific equipment and the analysis of large sequences of DNA (whole genomes) remains an important bioinformatics challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%