“…The diversity of haplotype and random matching probability were estimated according to Stoneking et al [ 9 ]. In addition, our data are compared with other data available from the literature, including Guizhou Miao [ 10 ], Henan Han [ 11 ], Chinese Bai [ 12 ], Xinjiang Mongolian [ 13 ], Southwest Gelao [ 14 ], Yunnan Dai [ 15 ], Liaoning Han [ 15 ], Pinghua Han in Guangxi [ 16 ], Xinjiang Kazakh [ 17 ], Beijing Han [ 15 ], Mulao in Guangxi [ 18 ], Chinese Hui [ 19 ], Kashmiri [ 20 ], Hazara people of Pakistan [ 21 ], African Americans in Orange, California [ 22 ], African Americans in Vermont, California [ 22 ], Parana of Brazil [ 23 ], Iranian [ 24 ], Alto Parana [ 25 ], Iraqi [ 26 ], Arabian [ 26 ], Kuwaiti [ 26 ], Palestinian [ 26 ], Anatolians in Turkey [ 26 ], Kurds in Iran [ 27 ], Bosnian of Roma [ 28 ], Gulagic in Africa [ 29 ], Punjab in Pakistan [ 30 ], Sierra Leone Mendes in West Africa [ 29 ], Tengnai in Sierra Leone [ 29 ], Mandinka in Sierra Leone [ 29 ], Polish Gypsies [ 31 ], Finns [ 32 ], Turks [ 33 ], Northern Tunis [ 34 ], North-central Moroccan [ 34 ], Mozabit [ 34 ], Moroccan Berber [ 34 ], Gdansk in northern Poland [ 35 ], Upper Silesia in southern Poland [ 35 ], Novgorod in northwest Russia [ 35 ], Christmas Island in Australia [ 36 ], Romanians [ 37 ], Pukhtunhwa in Pakistan [ 38 ], Mosuo [ 39 ], Bengali [ 40 ], Khattak of the Peshawar Valley [ 41 ], Kheshgi of the Peshawar Valley [ 41 ], Slovak [ 42 ], Hokkaido in Japan [ …”