2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole-watershed mercury balance at Sagehen Creek, Sierra Nevada, CA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) is not efficiently scavenged by snow. However, questions remain as to the MDN collection efficiency of snow (Sanei et al, 2010;Faïn et al, 2011). We have used long-term measurements of RGM and PBM at five sites in North America to derive an empirical gas-particle Hg(II) partitioning coefficient as a function of PM 2.5 and temperature: log 10 (K −1 ) = (10±1)-(2500±300)/T where K = (PBM/PM 2.5 )/RGM, PBM and RGM are in common mixing ratio units, PM 2.5 is in µg m −3 , and T is in K. Implementation of this Hg(II) gas-particle partitioning in the global 3-D GEOS-Chem Hg model yields Hg(II) fractions in the particle phase ranging from more than 90 % in cold air masses with high aerosol burdens to less than 10 % in warm air with low aerosol.…”
Section: Implications For Hg Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) is not efficiently scavenged by snow. However, questions remain as to the MDN collection efficiency of snow (Sanei et al, 2010;Faïn et al, 2011). We have used long-term measurements of RGM and PBM at five sites in North America to derive an empirical gas-particle Hg(II) partitioning coefficient as a function of PM 2.5 and temperature: log 10 (K −1 ) = (10±1)-(2500±300)/T where K = (PBM/PM 2.5 )/RGM, PBM and RGM are in common mixing ratio units, PM 2.5 is in µg m −3 , and T is in K. Implementation of this Hg(II) gas-particle partitioning in the global 3-D GEOS-Chem Hg model yields Hg(II) fractions in the particle phase ranging from more than 90 % in cold air masses with high aerosol burdens to less than 10 % in warm air with low aerosol.…”
Section: Implications For Hg Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ionic pulses of anions and cations occur upon snowpack melt, whereby ions are thought to be mobilized in the following order: SO (Berg, 1992;Brooks and Williams, 1999;Kuhn, 2001;Stottlemyer and Rutkowski, 1990;Williams and Melack, 1991b). In addition, pollutants such as Hg and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) as well as nutrients can undergo photochemical transformations and be subject to substantial gaseous re-emission to the atmosphere (Fain et al, 2011;Halsall, 2004;Lalonde et al, 2002;Poulain et al, 2007). Specific examples include photochemical reduction and re-emission of mercury (Hg) during snowpack storage as well as photolysis and emission of nitrate (NO − 3 ) from polar snow (Galbavy et al, 2007;Jacobi and Hilker, 2007;Rothlisberger et al, 2002).…”
Section: Pearson Et Al: Nutrient and Mercury Deposition And Storamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such different precipitation patterns can cause large differences in wet deposition across mountain ranges (Fain et al, 2011;NADP, 2012). Assessing spatial deposition patterns using snowpack sampling at multiple locations across a watershed should allow for better characterization of basin-wide deposition patterns as well as assessment of impacts of nearby urban areas versus regional and global sources of atmospheric deposition (Brown et al, 2011;Kuhn, 2001;Morales-Baquero et al, 2006;Vicars and Sickman, 2011).…”
Section: Pearson Et Al: Nutrient and Mercury Deposition And Storamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, precipitation amounts may directly lead to changes in wet deposition loads (NADP, 2011) leading to changes in soil Hg densities (although such effects may be highly nonlinear due to "washout" effects (Lamborg et al, 1995;Landis et al, 2002;Lyman and Gustin, 2008;Mason et al, 1997;Faïn et al, 2011). Further, correlations between annual precipitation and soil Hg may be caused by canopy wash-off and throughfall deposition which in forest ecosystems is a significant deposition flux (Demers et al, 2007;Rea et al, 1996;Graydon et al, 2008a), and such deposition loads likely would be efficiently retained in ecosystems (e.g., soils generally retain more than 90 % of Hg deposited with rainfall; Ericksen et al, 2005;Harris et al, 2007;Graydon et al, 2009;Hintelmann et al, 2002).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Precipitation Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%