2011
DOI: 10.1080/02568543.2011.533116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose Expertise?: An Analysis of Advice Giving in Early Childhood Parent-Teacher Conferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that due to this hierarchy, parents" expertise remained unrecognized. Forsberg (2007) also reported on the expert roles of parents and teachers, but in contrast to the study by Cheatham and Otrosky (2011), Forsberg argued that the division of responsibilities is "negotiated in terms of expertise" (p. 286). From interviews with Swedish parents and analysis of correspondence (school letters) between school and caregivers, Forsberg concluded that in educational matters both parents and teachers saw teachers as the experts, but when it came to childrearing issues, including children"s behavior in school, the roles changed and parents were recognized as the experts.…”
Section: Teachersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The authors concluded that due to this hierarchy, parents" expertise remained unrecognized. Forsberg (2007) also reported on the expert roles of parents and teachers, but in contrast to the study by Cheatham and Otrosky (2011), Forsberg argued that the division of responsibilities is "negotiated in terms of expertise" (p. 286). From interviews with Swedish parents and analysis of correspondence (school letters) between school and caregivers, Forsberg concluded that in educational matters both parents and teachers saw teachers as the experts, but when it came to childrearing issues, including children"s behavior in school, the roles changed and parents were recognized as the experts.…”
Section: Teachersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Family‐school partnerships, including the quality of communication between parents and teachers, have been shown to have a substantial impact on students’ success in and out of school (Cheatham & Ostrosky, ; Mautone et al., ). Communication has been widely recognized as both a facilitator of collaboration and a source of conflict in partnerships with families (Blue‐Banning, Summer, Frankland, Nelson, & Beegle, ; McNaughton et al., ; Tucker & Schwartz, ).…”
Section: Family‐school Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tucker and Schwartz () reported that parents were more comfortable providing input about behaviors than about academics. Additionally, Cheatham and Ostrosky () found that during parent‐teacher conferences, teachers spoke more often than parents. Other studies have confirmed that parents’ input on goal‐setting and decision‐making are frequently ignored (McNaughton et al., ).…”
Section: Limitations In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lawson (2003) also found teacher self-report to reflect the importance of parent-teacher collaboration in promoting children's learning and development. It has been noted that early childhood professionals may acknowledge and refer to their own expertise during parent-provider meetings, with less of a tendency to recognize and draw from parent expertise (Cheatham & Ostrosky, 2011). It has been noted that early childhood professionals may acknowledge and refer to their own expertise during parent-provider meetings, with less of a tendency to recognize and draw from parent expertise (Cheatham & Ostrosky, 2011).…”
Section: Parents As Professionals In Part C: Support From Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%