Whose Minerals, Whose Development? Rhetoric and Reality in Post‐Conflict Sierra Leone

Abstract

Despite boosts in mineral exports, popular post‐conflict minerals‐for‐development reforms in Sierra Leone have failed to significantly reduce poverty. This article uses power as an analytical lens to explore the reasons for this failure, with empirical material from the diamond sector's mining cooperatives scheme (2005), the Diamond Areas Community Development Fund (DACDF), and Kono District. The study shows that there was no significant improvement along four dimensions: material deprivation, education and health, vulnerability, and powerlessness. The authors argue that understanding the impact of these reforms requires a nuanced multi‐scalar examination of power relations, actors, and the social, political, economic and historical context within which mining is embedded. Their findings point to: 1) limits to mineral‐led poverty reduction and the need for realistic expectations and diversification of livelihood opportunities; and 2) the need for interventions that balance power asymmetries and the way that power is exercised among diverse actors, wherein decentralization offers early hope.

Oil discovery in Turkana County, Kenya: a source of conflict or development?

“…Remarkable turnaround cases include the problem of blood diamonds which fueled the 10-year civil war in Sierra Leone, and the oil-exploitation related environmental devastation and human-rights abuses (loss of livelihoods) committed against the Ogoni people of the Niger Delta in Nigeria (see Esparza & Wilson, 1999). Positive lessons include minerals-for-development initiatives to enhance local development benefits from mineral exploitation in Sierra Leone (Zulu & Wilson, 2012).…”

Between Soviet Legacy and Corporate Social Responsibility: Emerging Benefit Sharing Frameworks in the Irkutsk Oil Region, Russia

“…A resource extractive economy in the periphery is problematic with respect to local economic and social development, in addition to its environmental impacts. Although mining and other extractive activities undoubtedly deliver economic gains, they most often favor companies and other non-local actors, including national governments [38]. The fundamental issues associated with resource extraction at the local level can be explained in various ways by different theories, but generally stem from the dependency of local economies on external markets and actors, the effect of economic decoupling (i.e., resource sector is relatively detached from the local economy), "resource curse" (i.e., outpricing other forms of activity from labor market), weak human capital, and lack of competing technological paradigms [39,40].…”

School Leadership in West Africa: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

“…Bush and Oduro (2006: 360) categorise these contextual problems as low national and local income levels, the consequent pressures of poverty, minimal resource levels, and the associated paucity of buildings and ICT facilities. Industrial development, for example in the Delta region of Nigeria, and the Kono District of Sierra Leone, brings financial benefits and enhanced school resources, but these benefits do not extend to rural schools (Zulu and Wilson 2012). The recent Ebola crisis has exacerbated the medical, social and economic problems facing three West African countries; Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.…”