2021
DOI: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.210903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why agonists should stop discussing with deliberative theorists

Abstract: No abstract available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the outcome is different in its emphasis on non-consensus, with students learning to accept and channel conflicting ideas positively (and thus is more likely to reflect the “reality” of political life, see Tryggvason, 2018). These approaches have been theoretically explored by researchers, who have discussed merits, disadvantages, and efficiency (for an overview, see Koutsouris et al, 2022; Samuelsson & Bøyum, 2015; Tryggvason, 2021).…”
Section: Social Science Education As Citizenship Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the outcome is different in its emphasis on non-consensus, with students learning to accept and channel conflicting ideas positively (and thus is more likely to reflect the “reality” of political life, see Tryggvason, 2018). These approaches have been theoretically explored by researchers, who have discussed merits, disadvantages, and efficiency (for an overview, see Koutsouris et al, 2022; Samuelsson & Bøyum, 2015; Tryggvason, 2021).…”
Section: Social Science Education As Citizenship Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%