Why Are Russians Not Afraid of Economic Sanctions? Print Media Counter-Rhetoric Strategies

Kazun, Anastasia

doi:10.14515/monitoring.2016.1.11

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research indicates that during a "surprise crisis," the media often mobilizes and voices the dominant voice out of helplessness and lack of knowledge [25]. However, the present study shows a prevalence of criticism toward the government during the COVID-19 epidemic, although it is a "surprise crisis", possibly due to the media's inability to be the government's mouthpiece in the current era, where social media serves as a key channel for authentic communication [28].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

“…Additionally, the study found that commercial channels use a wide range of negative words and express criticism of the government, while positive aspects are rarely heard. This contradicts the literature, which suggests that the media typically supports the government during a crisis [28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

“…Therefore, the media's credibility can be undermined if it blindly supports the government, as consumers can cross-check and verify information through social networks [28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In crisis situations, the media's narratives and frames have a significant impact on the public's perception of the crisis and the government's policy, which, in turn, can affect consumer willingness to comply with government instructions [27]. As such, the media plays a critical role in either fueling criticism of government actions or mobilizing the public to support the government by providing a platform for the government's voice [28].…”

Section: Framing Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Public and commercial more of the same? The characteristics of the opening monologues of public and commercial channels during the COVID-19 pandemic

Laor

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The novel coronavirus, COVID-19, first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, rapidly spread across the globe and resulted in significant public concern. In response, numerous countries have implemented guidelines aimed at promoting social distancing, limiting movement and gatherings, instituting lockdowns and curfews, and closing institutions. As a result, the media, including news releases, has become a primary source of information for many individuals (Laor & Lissitsa, 2022). The present study seeks to investigate differences between major television programs featured on public and commercial channels in Israel, utilizing the lens of framing theory. Specifically, twelve monologues broadcast simultaneously on both channels were analyzed to compare differences in content, topics, format, and accompanying visuals. The study’s results indicate that both commercial and public channels exhibited similar behavior in shaping public opinion during the crisis period. Specifically, both channels displayed criticism of the government’s conduct and utilized negative framing techniques while neglecting to provide space for popular voices. Nevertheless, certain distinctions between the commercial and public broadcasting spheres still persist, particularly in the realm of visual presentation, as some long-standing elements that typify each channel have endured over time.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

“…Therefore, the media's credibility can be undermined if it blindly supports the government, as consumers can cross-check and verify information through social networks [28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Framing Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations