2020
DOI: 10.1007/698_2020_586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Biodegradable Chemicals Persist in the Environment? A Look at Bioavailability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between observed field dissipation and laboratory rate constants from literature could, on the other hand, also be due to the dissimilarity in partial sequestration of the pesticides, 46 which leads to their reduced availability for subsequent dissipation. 25 For literature-based data, this underestimation of the sequestration process could most likely be due to the fact that environmental factors, such as varying soil temperature and moisture contents, are not taken into account during dissipation studies for risk assessments or registration processes. 47 We also examined substance properties of the pesticides to determine if commonalities were evident among the substances that deviate strongly from expected values and if these properties could account for the greater deviation in the dissipation behavior of these substances compared to the literature values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between observed field dissipation and laboratory rate constants from literature could, on the other hand, also be due to the dissimilarity in partial sequestration of the pesticides, 46 which leads to their reduced availability for subsequent dissipation. 25 For literature-based data, this underestimation of the sequestration process could most likely be due to the fact that environmental factors, such as varying soil temperature and moisture contents, are not taken into account during dissipation studies for risk assessments or registration processes. 47 We also examined substance properties of the pesticides to determine if commonalities were evident among the substances that deviate strongly from expected values and if these properties could account for the greater deviation in the dissipation behavior of these substances compared to the literature values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for pesticides with a low half-life, it appears that the assumption of first-order dissipation may not be suitable for estimation over an extended period of time of more than a couple of half-lives as the discrepancy in observed and predicted dissipation was particularly striking for them. The difference between observed field dissipation and laboratory rate constants from literature could, on the other hand, also be due to the dissimilarity in partial sequestration of the pesticides, which leads to their reduced availability for subsequent dissipation . For literature-based data, this underestimation of the sequestration process could most likely be due to the fact that environmental factors, such as varying soil temperature and moisture contents, are not taken into account during dissipation studies for risk assessments or registration processes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The contrasting outcomes of N and P addition on biodegradation enhancements as described above are poorly explained but could be attributed to (i) the presence of significantly different amounts of bioavailable background N and P in the soils; (ii) the lack of bioavailability of the amended nutrients due to chemisorption to soil or other processes; (iii) impacts of diesel and nutrients on the soil microbial community, including compositional differences in microbial R and K strategists; or (iv) concentrations and types of petroleum hydrocarbon sources. , R-strategists are species that grow in substrate-rich environments, in contrast to K-strategists that grow in substrate-limited environments…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%