2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-0594-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why biomanipulation can be effective in peaty lakes

Abstract: The effects of fish stock reduction (biomanipulation) was studied in an 85 ha shallow peaty turbid lake. The lake cleared in a 4-week period in April-May 2004, which demonstrated that biomanipulation can be effective in peaty lakes. We demonstrated that it is possible to reduce the fish stock to <25 kg ha -1 benthivorous fish and <15 kg ha -1 planktivorous fish, sufficiently low to switch the lake from a turbid to a clear state. Knowledge of lake morphology, fish stock, fish behaviour, and a variety of fishing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, crayfish density will not be strongly coupled to the availability of macrophytes in lakes with organic sediments, such as our study lake. Therefore, grazing pressure on macrophytes is potentially high, particularly when predation on the crayfish is low, for instance when fish densities are low due to biomanipulation, as is the case in our study lake [40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, crayfish density will not be strongly coupled to the availability of macrophytes in lakes with organic sediments, such as our study lake. Therefore, grazing pressure on macrophytes is potentially high, particularly when predation on the crayfish is low, for instance when fish densities are low due to biomanipulation, as is the case in our study lake [40]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In The Netherlands, P. clarkii was first observed in 1985 [30] and has rapidly spread throughout the peat district in the west of the country in the last decade(Figure 1). Many restoration projects have been executed to restore the water transparency and promote the return of macrophytes in the shallow water bodies of this peat district [4,39,40]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake Terra Nova (85 ha) is a shallow eutrophic peat lake, while Lake Waterleidingplas (160 ha) is a shallow mesotrophic lake with a sand bottom. Lake Waterleidingplas is used as a drinking water reservoir and has good water quality, whereas Lake Terra Nova is used for water storage and has undergone intensive restoration management to improve its water quality and biodiversity (Ter Heerdt and Hootsmans, 2007 ; Immers et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of fish stock was suggested in some studies as a means of attempting to control eutrophication (Shapiro 1990; Jeppesen et al . 1997; Heerdt & Hootsmans 2007). Thus, a strategy of fish stocking was applied to Lake Rupa, which exhibited extensive growths of aquatic vegetation, to the extent that the lake was beginning to be transformed into swampy land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%