2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why climate migration is not managed retreat: Six justifications

Abstract: Highlights The experiences of climate migrants and those resettled through retreat are radically different. The misuse of terms – climate migration and managed retreat – impede plans and policy solutions. Transformational approaches are needed in how countries address climate-induced mobilities. New legal and institutional pathways for the resettlement of CDPs are urgently needed. A new global convention on CDPs with c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dundon & Abkowitz [43] in their review paper also discuss at length the terminology issue, suggesting a range of different terms including their preference for ‘transformative adaptation’ so as to better encompass the positive aspects of retreat. Ajibade et al [63] provide a comprehensive analysis of the differences between climate migration and managed retreat, noting that these are not synonymous terms (contra [64], who tag their paper as managed retreat, but predominately analyse climate migration presenting a tripartite typology: places that lose people, places that receive people and places that are optimal destinations). Ajibade [53] also provides a detailed analysis of the legal, political, economic and cultural aspects of retreat, which are also strong reasons as to why we need to be clear about what we mean in relevant terminology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dundon & Abkowitz [43] in their review paper also discuss at length the terminology issue, suggesting a range of different terms including their preference for ‘transformative adaptation’ so as to better encompass the positive aspects of retreat. Ajibade et al [63] provide a comprehensive analysis of the differences between climate migration and managed retreat, noting that these are not synonymous terms (contra [64], who tag their paper as managed retreat, but predominately analyse climate migration presenting a tripartite typology: places that lose people, places that receive people and places that are optimal destinations). Ajibade [53] also provides a detailed analysis of the legal, political, economic and cultural aspects of retreat, which are also strong reasons as to why we need to be clear about what we mean in relevant terminology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the migratory effect caused by climate change, since 2016 there has been an increase in the number of articles that use the term climate justice, defined as the imperative need to include the environmental dimension in all decision-making (regardless of the corresponding discipline), with a legal framework that allows action to be taken in the event that this dimension is not taken into consideration [ 6 ]. In the scientific literature, there are several works that relate climate justice to climate change-induced migration, such as the research by Ajibade et al [ 3 ], who emphasise the importance of differentiating climate migration from managed retreat to enhance climate justice, or the study by Ahmed [ 2 ] focused on identifying the responsibility of climate refugees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to retreating, accommodating focuses on utilizing topography and water channeling efforts to manage the rising sea around an urban area. This approach focuses on considering options such as canals and raised structures to coexist with the rising sea level [34][35][36]. The argument for this approach being those examples such as Venice and Amsterdam which have demonstrated over centuries that accommodation can be effective given the planning and strategic management of the solution.…”
Section: Protection Feasibility and Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%