2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why dieters fail: Testing the goal conflict model of eating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
281
4
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
21
281
4
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this attention bias for palatable high energy foods is at the expense of the conflicting long-term goal (Papies et al, 2007;Stroebe et al, 2008). Once an attentional bias for palatable food has been initiated, this will continue to activate the eating enjoyment goal, which in turn will maintain the attentional bias for palatable unhealthy foods (Papies et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this attention bias for palatable high energy foods is at the expense of the conflicting long-term goal (Papies et al, 2007;Stroebe et al, 2008). Once an attentional bias for palatable food has been initiated, this will continue to activate the eating enjoyment goal, which in turn will maintain the attentional bias for palatable unhealthy foods (Papies et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is typically a highly adaptive mechanism that allows us to navigate complex Running head: ROLE OF ATTENTION IN GOAL PRIMING 5 environments efficiently, it can be problematic in the current living environment, where the abundance of attractive food cues typically triggers these processes in favor of the goal of enjoying good food (Papies, Stroebe, & Aarts, 2007;Stroebe et al, 2008). This may ultimately lead to overeating and to weight gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In successful dieters, such cues activate a long-term 'dieting' goal, whereas in unsuccessful dieters they activate the hedonic 'eating' goal. [120][121][122] Although these studies suggest that individuals who are able to control their eating show enhanced self-regulation, the malleability of self-regulatory capacities is debated and some researchers have argued that attempts to boost selfregulatory skills as a route to greater control over eating may be misplaced: 'Participants in the National Weight Control Registry who have demonstrated an impressive (and rare) ability to maintain a large weight loss, presumably are at the upper end of the distribution of obesity-prone individuals' ability to make long-term changes in their food intake and activity level. However, the fact that some people demonstrate such tight and prolonged control over their food intake, physical activity, and body weight does not mean that weight control professionals are able to instil this ability among those who do not naturally possess it (p 52S).'…”
Section: Links Between Restraint and General Self-regulatory Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This larger effect may occur due to exercise assisting restrained individuals in controlling their eating behaviour (King, 1999). According to the goal conflict model of eating, restrained eating behaviour is determined by two opposing goals, eating enjoyment and weight control (Stroebe, Mensink, Aarts, Schut, & Kruglanski, 2008;Stroebe, van Koningsbruggen, Papies, & Aarts, 2013). The more active goal is argued to inhibit the other, and consequently exerts greater influence over eating behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%