Why do colder mothers produce larger eggs? An optimality approach

Abstract

SUMMARYOne of the more common patterns of offspring size variation is that mothers tend to produce larger offspring at lower temperatures. Whether such variation is adaptive remains unclear. Determining whether optimal offspring size differs between thermal environments provides a direct way of assessing the adaptive significance of temperature-driven variation in egg size. Here, we examined the relationship between offspring size and performance at three temperatures for several important fitness components in the zebra fish, Danio rerio. The effects of egg size on performance were highly variable among life-history stages (i.e. pre-and post-hatching) and dependent on the thermal environment; offspring size positively affected performance at some temperatures but negatively affected performance at others. When we used these data to generate a simple optimality model, the model predicted that mothers should produce the largest size offspring at the lowest temperature, offspring of intermediate size at the highest temperature and the smallest offspring at the intermediate temperature. An experimental test of these predictions showed that the rank order of observed offspring sizes produced by mothers matched our predictions. Our results suggest that mothers adaptively manipulate the size of their offspring in response to thermally driven changes in offspring performance and highlight the utility of optimality approaches for understanding offspring size variation. Supplementary material available online at

Trans-generational plasticity in physiological thermal tolerance is modulated by maternal pre-reproductive environment in the polychaeteOphryotrocha labronica

“…Huestis and Marshall, 2006;Mousseau and Dingle, 1991a;Mousseau and Dingle, 1991b;Mousseau and Fox, 1998b), offspring size and growth (e.g. Bacigalupe et al, 2007;Bownds et al, 2010;Chambers and Leggett, 1996;Fischer et al, 2003a;Fischer et al, 2003b;Fox et al, 1999;Kaplan and Phillips, 2006;Salinas and Munch, 2012), dispersal ability (e.g. Burgess and Marshall, 2011;Marshall, 2008) and developmental plasticity (e.g.…”

Complex response in size-related traits of the bulb mites (Rhizoglyphus robini) in elevated thermal conditions - an experimental evolution approach

“…However, it has been observed that changes in egg size with ambient temperature may occur within a single generation, indicating the effect of phenotypic plasticity (Blanckenhorn, 2001). Despite a growing number of studies investigating the selective benefits of egg size at different temperatures (Blanckenhorn, 2000;Fischer et al, 2003;Bownds et al, 2010;Burgess and Marshall, 2011), to our knowledge, only one experiment has attempted to determine whether egg size and phenotypic plasticity for this trait can evolve (Azevedo et al, 1996).…”

Parental thermal environment alters offspring sex ratio and fitness in an oviparous lizard

“…Across animals, experimental parental temperatures during egg production impact components of offspring fitness, often enhancing fitness in warmer compared with cooler parental temperatures (Gilchrist and Huey, 2001;Shine, 2006;Steigenga and Fischer, 2007;Lorioux et al, 2012; but see Rodríguez-Díaz and Braña, 2011;Guillaume et al, 2016). In several fish species, offspring growth at a given temperature is greatest when the parental temperature is the same (Bownds et al, 2010;Salinas and Munch, 2012;Shama, 2015). Moreover, the complexity of thermal non-genetic effects is becoming more apparent through evidence of persistence to the grand-offspring generation , discordant paternal and maternal effects Guilluame et al, 2016), and possible bet hedging of offspring phenotype (Shama, 2015).…”