2021
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1985103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do students plagiarise? Informing higher education teaching and learning policy and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher education in the anglosphere tends to be largely self-governing and creates large libraries of policy and procedure documentation to support this position (Heller & Heller, 2001;Karmel, 2001;Lisewski, 2021). Frequently policy in higher education institutions is criticised for a broad variety of reasons, from equity and inclusion (Bennett & Lumb, 2019;Brett, 2016;Clancy & Goastellec, 2007) through failings during disruptive change (Amoah & Mok, 2022;Ayton et al, 2021) and in 'some' cases through its disconnect from the practices and experiences of those working/studying in the institution (Bessant, 2002;Kift et al, 2010;Winter, 2009). The role for the academic developer sits somewhere between policy deviser, particularly in the spaces of academic integrity and teaching requirements/performance, and policy critic, constrained by rules they did not develop and had no say in (Di Napoli et al, 2010;East & Donnelly, 2012;Lisewski, 2021).…”
Section: Policy and Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher education in the anglosphere tends to be largely self-governing and creates large libraries of policy and procedure documentation to support this position (Heller & Heller, 2001;Karmel, 2001;Lisewski, 2021). Frequently policy in higher education institutions is criticised for a broad variety of reasons, from equity and inclusion (Bennett & Lumb, 2019;Brett, 2016;Clancy & Goastellec, 2007) through failings during disruptive change (Amoah & Mok, 2022;Ayton et al, 2021) and in 'some' cases through its disconnect from the practices and experiences of those working/studying in the institution (Bessant, 2002;Kift et al, 2010;Winter, 2009). The role for the academic developer sits somewhere between policy deviser, particularly in the spaces of academic integrity and teaching requirements/performance, and policy critic, constrained by rules they did not develop and had no say in (Di Napoli et al, 2010;East & Donnelly, 2012;Lisewski, 2021).…”
Section: Policy and Possibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%