Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence

Abstract

Women are under-represented in academic medicine. We reviewed the empirical evidence focusing on the reasons for women's choice or rejection of careers in academic medicine. Using a systematic search, we identified 52 studies published between 1985, and 2015. More than half had methodological limitations and most were from North America. Eight main themes were explored in these studies. There was consistent evidence for four of these themes: women are interested in teaching more than in research; participation in research can encourage women into academic medicine; women lack adequate mentors and role models; and women experience gender discrimination and bias. The evidence was conflicting on four themes: women are less interested in research than men; women lose commitment to research as their education and training progress; women are deterred from academic careers by financial considerations; and women are deterred by concerns about work-life balance. Inconsistency of findings across studies suggests significant opportunities to overcome barriers by providing a more enabling environment. We identified substantial gaps in the scientific literature that could form the focus of future research, including shifting the focus from individuals' career choices to the societal and organisational contexts and cultures within which those choices are made; extending the evidence base to include a wider range of countries and settings; and testing the efficacy of interventions.

Comparing the participation of men and women in academic medicine in medical colleges in Sudan: A cross-sectional survey

“…Laurel Edmund et al ., reported that women are generally interested in teaching more than research and they lose commitment to research as their academic education progress. [27] Furthermore, less production in academic and research areas is also among women was also reported in other similar studies. [28]…”

Maternity and paternity leave in otolaryngology residency training in the United States

“…In situations where women are encouraged to have children during research electives (10 of our respondents suggested that research rotations offered better timing for pregnancy), there is a potential impact and disadvantage on research productivity. There are data that show that women less often choose academics, and that women are often less competitive for equivalent jobs . Whereas nonparents will use research time to advance professionally, parents will often use this more flexible time to address nonacademic concerns, and of this group, mothers are disproportionately affected .…”

Women and academic careers in obstetrics and gynaecology: aspirations and obstacles among postgraduate trainees – a mixed‐methods study

“…Edmunds et al . analysed 52 articles on this subject in a narrative review published in The Lancet in April 2016.…”