2013
DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2013-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Education for Sustainable Development Needs Early Childhood Education: The Case of Norway

Abstract: With this article, the author intends to outline a legitimising basis for implementing education for sustainable development (ESD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important finding worth noting is that the issue of children's agency was recurring in many of the articles, and children as agents for change and the need to listen to children's voices was described both in relation to environmental aspects as well as social aspects of sustainability [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Research In Education For Sustainability Between 2013 and 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important finding worth noting is that the issue of children's agency was recurring in many of the articles, and children as agents for change and the need to listen to children's voices was described both in relation to environmental aspects as well as social aspects of sustainability [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Research In Education For Sustainability Between 2013 and 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holistic perspective in Education for Sustainability was more or less applied in an overwhelming majority of the articles (36 of 41). At least three interdependent dimensions-environmental, economic, and social-were described in almost all of the articles, implicitly or explicitly, and, while some of them mainly related their research, findings, and discussions to the environmental dimension [59,60], a large proportion of the articles explicitly supported a socially critical and holistic informed perspective on Education for Sustainability [21,40,[48][49][50][51][52]54,56,57,[61][62][63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Application Of a Holistic Perspective In Education For Sustamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divide between anthropocentric/non-anthropocentric approaches was used in articles by SalÓte, Ged˛˚ne and Ged˛˚ne (2009), Kostoulas-Makrakis (2010), Ged˛˚ne and Ged˛˚ne (2011), and Buttigieg and Pace (2013) ñ these authors used this divide mainly to evaluate the views of research participants. The critique of anthropocentrism was oriented mostly toward normative definitions and approaches in the field of sustainability (Bentham, 2013;Cutanda & Murga-Menoyo, 2014;Eriksen, 2013;Mandolini, 2007;Pipere & MiËule, 2014;Smith, 2011).…”
Section: Research Paradigms (Jtefs 2005ñ2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews by Agut et al (2014) has pointed out that sustainability disclosure rules must be in a complete and clear disclosure of the knowledge and hands-on practice of conservation activities in the study of pre-school students is requirement. Studies also mention that teacher have the important role about sustainability (Eriksen, 2013;Eva 2013;Samuelsson and Kaga, 2010). Focus on improving behavior among students will provide a positive impact (Edwards & Moore, 2012) and the positive impact of these behaviors can be practiced outside of the school especially with family members (Bates and Tregenza, 2007;Braithwaite, 2014).…”
Section: Psu-usm-nstru 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%