2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is solar cycle 24 an inefficient producer of high-energy particle events?

Abstract: Aims. The aim of the study is to investigate the reason for the low productivity of high-energy SEPs in the present solar cycle. Methods. We employ scaling laws derived from diffusive shock acceleration theory and simulation studies including proton-generated upstream Alfvén waves to find out how the changes observed in the long-term average properties of the erupting and ambient coronal and/or solar wind plasma would affect the ability of shocks to accelerate particles to the highest energies. Results. Provid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Sandberg et al (2014) developed a method for cross-calibrating the medium energy GOES/EPS channels with corresponding channels of the science-level IMP-8/GME instrument. The effect of this cross-correlation was validated by Rodriguez et al (2017) using STEREO observations (Mewaldt et al, 2008;von Rosenvinge et al, 2008). Sandberg et al (2014) also noted some problems with the low energy IMP-8 data, attributed to the gradual failing of the LED instrument between 1984 and 1990.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Sandberg et al (2014) developed a method for cross-calibrating the medium energy GOES/EPS channels with corresponding channels of the science-level IMP-8/GME instrument. The effect of this cross-correlation was validated by Rodriguez et al (2017) using STEREO observations (Mewaldt et al, 2008;von Rosenvinge et al, 2008). Sandberg et al (2014) also noted some problems with the low energy IMP-8 data, attributed to the gradual failing of the LED instrument between 1984 and 1990.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The agreement suggests that during the solar cycles 19-24, on average, GLEs have been responsible for a major portion of fluence even at low energies. On shorter timescales this is not necessarily the case; for example, during the first eight years of cycle 24 the total proton fluence at >10 MeV from sub-GLEs, calculated with the Band-fits (parameters given in Vainio et al, 2017), was about 7.9 ⋅ 10 8 cm À2 sr À1 , whereas the only GLE of the period produced a fluence of about 6.6 ⋅ 10 6 cm À2 sr À1 , i.e., two orders of magnitude smaller.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variability is present only in the inner corona (below~3 solar radii). In addition, there is strong lateral variability in seed particledensities in the corona which have been shown to be important factor controlling the highest energies obtained from the shock acceleration (Vainio et al, 2017). These factors give rise to very localised regions Fig.…”
Section: Cumulative Fluence Model Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLE dataset spans high-energy SEP events over almost seven solar cycles providing sufficient basis for statistical studies (e.g. Gopalswamy et al, 2014;Raukunen et al, 2017;Vainio et al, 2017). Since the beginning of systematic ground-based measurements of cosmic rays, over 70 GLEs have been "officially" registered so far (see the International GLE Database gle.oulu.fi).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%