2015
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2015.1043927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why More Forward-Looking Accounting Standards Can Reduce Financial Reporting Quality

Abstract: A premise of standard setters and of much empirical research is that improving the quality of accounting standards and their implementation increases information in capital markets. This paper challenges this premise and shows that there are situations in which 'better', that is, more forwardlooking, accounting standards reduce the information content of financial reports. The reason is that a forward-looking accounting standard affects the smoothness of reported earnings, which can conflict with the manager's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We aim to investigate the possible association and interaction between financial risk disclosure and NFI from the investors' perspective. One specific strand of literature supports a substitutive effect, arguing that financial risk disclosure has a negative effect on NF risk disclosure (Ewert & Wagenhofer, 2016), as usefulness and materiality are key issues that relate to both financial and nonfinancial information. A second strand of literature posits that NF risk disclosure could not substitute (or be substituted by) the financial risk disclosure, because the two types of disclosures provide different information to investors (Hoogervorst, 2019).…”
Section: Related Research and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to investigate the possible association and interaction between financial risk disclosure and NFI from the investors' perspective. One specific strand of literature supports a substitutive effect, arguing that financial risk disclosure has a negative effect on NF risk disclosure (Ewert & Wagenhofer, 2016), as usefulness and materiality are key issues that relate to both financial and nonfinancial information. A second strand of literature posits that NF risk disclosure could not substitute (or be substituted by) the financial risk disclosure, because the two types of disclosures provide different information to investors (Hoogervorst, 2019).…”
Section: Related Research and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ewert and Wagenhofer (2016), IASB's objective in financial reporting is to supply capital providers with information regarding the companies' expected future cash flows. Although the segregation of continuing and discontinued operations in the income statement may lead to more realistic and more meaningful projections and future comparisons, as suggested by Paul A.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing need to improve on the quality of financial statements prompt regulators to standardise and increase coverage of the explanatory and narrative aspects of annual reports and accounts (Di Pietra, Gebhardt, McLeay, & Ronen, 2014). This can be observed by the increase in some pages and volume of annual reports occasioned by forward-looking items that may not necessarily improve FRQ (Ewert & Wagenhofer, 2015). The quest for more effective regulation is closely linked to corporate governance laws requires sufficient dynamism to provide for the complexities of the changing firms' characteristics.…”
Section: Accounting Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant literature suggests that accounting regulation improves financial reporting quality (Abdulmalik & Ahmad, 2016;Ewert & Wagenhofer, 2015;Inchausti, 1997;Jones & Sharma, 2001;Wagenhofer, 2011). Palea ( 2013) examined whether IFRS affect FRQ.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%