2017
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201700797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Multiples Do Not Contribute to Deconvolution Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach was realized as a cross-correlation of the modeled shot and receiver wavefields for each time step. Multiples do not contribute to cross-correlation imaging and can be removed by an additional deconvolutional filter [38]. This method was implemented as a reverse time migration (RTM) algorithm including a 1D deconvolution imaging condition (Equation ( 8)).…”
Section: Methods B: Rtm-decomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was realized as a cross-correlation of the modeled shot and receiver wavefields for each time step. Multiples do not contribute to cross-correlation imaging and can be removed by an additional deconvolutional filter [38]. This method was implemented as a reverse time migration (RTM) algorithm including a 1D deconvolution imaging condition (Equation ( 8)).…”
Section: Methods B: Rtm-decomentioning
confidence: 99%