2018
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201812.0077.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Must Be Grounded in Sound Biodiversity Science

Abstract: The current focus on afforestation in climate policy runs the risk of compromising both longterm carbon storage and human adaptation. It also works against efforts to stem the tide of biodiversity loss. We outline why an emphasis on diverse, intact natural ecosystems—as opposed to tree plantations with fast-growing exotic species—will help nations deliver the goals of the Paris Agreement and much more.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formalising a linkage between gilded and safe-development traps matters because their effects likely compound each other nonlinearly, such that disaster risk only increases and disaster-risk reduction becomes increasingly difficult to achieve. "Safe development" maladaptation in hazard-prone coastal zones is especially topical because of the kinds of projects typically supported by climate-finance programmes for climate-change adaptation, per the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Sovacool, 2011;Donner et al, 2011;Seddon et al, 2020). Even…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalising a linkage between gilded and safe-development traps matters because their effects likely compound each other nonlinearly, such that disaster risk only increases and disaster-risk reduction becomes increasingly difficult to achieve. "Safe development" maladaptation in hazard-prone coastal zones is especially topical because of the kinds of projects typically supported by climate-finance programmes for climate-change adaptation, per the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Sovacool, 2011;Donner et al, 2011;Seddon et al, 2020). Even…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NbS can potentially provide 37% of the mitigation needed to meet the Paris Agreement (IPBES, 2019). However, this figure may also be overestimated as its success is highly dependent on many factors, including governance and financing capacity (Griscom et al, 2020;Seddon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gaps In Addressing Agricultural Production and Food Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rising temperatures can alter forest stability (e.g. through wildfires), thus affecting the capacity to store carbon (Anderegg et al, 2020 [62] ). Similarly, between 70 to 90% of coral reefs would disappear if global surface temperatures increased by Report on Climate Change and Land (IPCC, 2019 [27] )have advocated for the use of NbS to address climate change.…”
Section: Practical Limitations Of Nature-based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, between 70 to 90% of coral reefs would disappear if global surface temperatures increased by Report on Climate Change and Land (IPCC, 2019 [27] )have advocated for the use of NbS to address climate change. In addition, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has recently issued a global standard for NbS that aims to "increase demand for NbS while safeguarding people and nature" (IUCN, 2020 [62] ). Building on this momentum, NbS have been identified as a key priority of the discussions for the G20 Climate Stewardship Working Group under the G20 Saudi Presidency in 2020 and the United Kingdom is putting them at the heart of the COP26 to be held in 2021.…”
Section: Practical Limitations Of Nature-based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%