“…Teachers with a strong sense of efficacy who believe in their capabilities to achieve goals are more likely to engage in structured collaboration and improvement strategies (Runhaar et al, 2010;Thoonen et al, 2011). Based on an expectancyvalue model of teacher motivation, Drossel et al (2018) show that subjective values explain teachers' motivation to collaborate. The personal relevance of collaboration for teachers and their subjective values also relate to teachers' perceptions of their principals as well as their personal tendency to collaborate.…”
Section: Attributes and Team Behaviormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Different reasons for teacher collaboration can be found in the literature (e.g., Drossel et al, 2018). This subsection discusses answers found within the scientific literature to the first research question of what motivates teachers to collaborate.…”
Section: What Motivates Teachers To Collaborate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the articles however, use a combination of different approaches or do not specify their motivation concept. Seven of the 25 articles analyzed for this review adapted social cognitive theory and two adapted an expectancy-value-model (Thoonen et al, 2011;Drossel et al, 2018). The remaining studies either did not specify their theoretical conceptualizations of motivation (see e.g., Egodawatte et al, 2011) or used socio-culturally oriented theories instead of motivation theories [e.g., work group effectiveness model (Conley et al, 2004;Honingh and Hooge, 2014)].…”
Section: Motivation As a Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect important for educational practice applies to teachers' conception of autonomy. Previous research has demonstrated the fundamental effect that teachers' subjective perception of the relevance of collaboration has on their engagement in collaboration (e.g., Drossel et al, 2018). This implies the need to increase the relevance of cooperative aspects in teacher education and training with the aim of supporting the individual internalization of the importance of collaboration and a collaborative understanding of teacher autonomy.…”
The mutual dependency of teacher collaboration and motivation has emerged as a promising research field. This article now sets out to systematically review peer-reviewed articles on the interconnection of these concepts. It looks at main findings, identifies ambiguities and contradictions in the constructs and highlights their contested nature. It is shown that many studies use different theoretical approaches and conceptual operationalizations. This leads to inconsistent empirical findings. In addition, teacher collaboration is often perceived as a threat to teacher autonomy. This is surprising considering that both teacher collaboration and teacher autonomy positively affect teacher motivation according to many empirical findings.
“…Teachers with a strong sense of efficacy who believe in their capabilities to achieve goals are more likely to engage in structured collaboration and improvement strategies (Runhaar et al, 2010;Thoonen et al, 2011). Based on an expectancyvalue model of teacher motivation, Drossel et al (2018) show that subjective values explain teachers' motivation to collaborate. The personal relevance of collaboration for teachers and their subjective values also relate to teachers' perceptions of their principals as well as their personal tendency to collaborate.…”
Section: Attributes and Team Behaviormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Different reasons for teacher collaboration can be found in the literature (e.g., Drossel et al, 2018). This subsection discusses answers found within the scientific literature to the first research question of what motivates teachers to collaborate.…”
Section: What Motivates Teachers To Collaborate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the articles however, use a combination of different approaches or do not specify their motivation concept. Seven of the 25 articles analyzed for this review adapted social cognitive theory and two adapted an expectancy-value-model (Thoonen et al, 2011;Drossel et al, 2018). The remaining studies either did not specify their theoretical conceptualizations of motivation (see e.g., Egodawatte et al, 2011) or used socio-culturally oriented theories instead of motivation theories [e.g., work group effectiveness model (Conley et al, 2004;Honingh and Hooge, 2014)].…”
Section: Motivation As a Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect important for educational practice applies to teachers' conception of autonomy. Previous research has demonstrated the fundamental effect that teachers' subjective perception of the relevance of collaboration has on their engagement in collaboration (e.g., Drossel et al, 2018). This implies the need to increase the relevance of cooperative aspects in teacher education and training with the aim of supporting the individual internalization of the importance of collaboration and a collaborative understanding of teacher autonomy.…”
The mutual dependency of teacher collaboration and motivation has emerged as a promising research field. This article now sets out to systematically review peer-reviewed articles on the interconnection of these concepts. It looks at main findings, identifies ambiguities and contradictions in the constructs and highlights their contested nature. It is shown that many studies use different theoretical approaches and conceptual operationalizations. This leads to inconsistent empirical findings. In addition, teacher collaboration is often perceived as a threat to teacher autonomy. This is surprising considering that both teacher collaboration and teacher autonomy positively affect teacher motivation according to many empirical findings.
“…Zuteilung des/der Praktikumspartner*in für die weitere Professionalisierung der angehenden Lehrpersonen von Bedeutung ist. Entwickeln Lehramtsstudierende eine negative Einstellung zu Kooperation, so kann dies zur Folge haben, dass sie in der späteren Berufsausübung weniger kooperieren und insbesondere auf der Unterrichtsebene weniger Zusammenarbeit stattfindet (Drossel, Eickelmann, van Ophuysen & Bos, 2019;Keller-Schneider & Albisser, 2013). Daher ist aus unserer Sicht bereits im Lehramtsstudium darauf zu achten, dass sich positive Einstellungen zur Teamarbeit entwickeln können.…”
Section: Zusammenfassung Und Implikationenunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.