2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-012-0523-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the Euler scheme in particle tracking is not enough: the shallow-sea pycnocline test case

Abstract: During the last decades, the Euler scheme was the common "workhorse" in particle tracking, although it is the lowest-order approximation of the underlying stochastic differential equation. To convince the modelling community of the need for better methods, we have constructed a new test case that will show the shortcomings of the Euler scheme. We use an idealised shallow-water diffusivity profile that mimics the presence of a sharp pycnocline and thus a quasi-impermeable barrier to vertical diffusion. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After evaluating the performance of 10 random walk schemes [ Gräwe , ], Gräwe et al . [] recommended the use of either the Milstein scheme or higher order schemes such as S1.5 or PC2. The order of accuracy (rate of convergence) of numerical approximations to stochastic differential equations is separated into weak and strong cases, where the weak case relates to the accuracy of the ensemble particle distribution, while the strong case relates to the accuracy of particle trajectories [ Gräwe , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After evaluating the performance of 10 random walk schemes [ Gräwe , ], Gräwe et al . [] recommended the use of either the Milstein scheme or higher order schemes such as S1.5 or PC2. The order of accuracy (rate of convergence) of numerical approximations to stochastic differential equations is separated into weak and strong cases, where the weak case relates to the accuracy of the ensemble particle distribution, while the strong case relates to the accuracy of particle trajectories [ Gräwe , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These artifacts can be easy to misinterpret as features of interest. Several studies have applied Lagrangian particle models to the 1‐D column case with steady, idealized diffusivity profiles [ Gräwe et al ., ; Ross and Sharples , ; Visser , ]. In 3‐D ocean and lake models, use of random‐walk vertical mixing schemes can be challenging because the required time step varies spatially and temporally over the model domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme no longer works when is discontinuous (see e.g. [19,27] for numerical tests). The latter case is still a challenging problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many interpretations and simulation techniques have been proposed during the last twenty years. Some numerical methods consider only the mathematical aspect of the simulation [12-14, 30, 31, 36-38] while others are driven by applications in a specific field: in geophysics [1-4, 9, 11, 22, 24-27, 33, 35, 43-46, 48, 55], fluid/gas dynamics [21], ecology [8,42,47], brain imaging [16], astrophysics [34,56], meteorology [54], oceanography [19,20,53], molecular dynamics [7,39], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation