2019
DOI: 10.1111/imj.14628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why we should stop performing vertebroplasties for osteoporotic spinal fractures

Abstract: While vertebroplasty enjoys continued use in some settings, there is now high‐moderate quality evidence based on systematic review that includes five placebo‐controlled trials that it provides no benefits over placebo and these results do not differ according to pain duration (≤6 vs >6 weeks). A clinically important increased risk of incident symptomatic vertebral fractures or other serious adverse events cannot be excluded due to small event numbers. Serious harms including cord compression, ventricular perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VAP can significantly and quickly reduce back pain by restoring the stability of the fractured vertebra. Recently, however, high‐ to moderate‐quality evidence indicated that VAP offered no clinical benefits compared with the sham procedure and did not recommend VAP to treat acute or subacute OVCF 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VAP can significantly and quickly reduce back pain by restoring the stability of the fractured vertebra. Recently, however, high‐ to moderate‐quality evidence indicated that VAP offered no clinical benefits compared with the sham procedure and did not recommend VAP to treat acute or subacute OVCF 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertebral augmentation procedure (VAP) was widely applied to stabilize the fractured vertebrae to relieve back pain immediately, considering the drawbacks of conservative treatment 15 . However, recent high‐ to moderate‐quality evidence indicates that VAP does not offer significant clinical benefits compared with the sham procedure 16 , 17 . One challenge was that VAP treatment only targeted the restoration of stability of the fractured vertebrae and did not improve vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) to decrease the fracture risk of the treated or non‐treated vertebrae 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VAP seems to be a promising method to maintain the vertebral height to prevent progressive vertebral collapse. However, controversies on its benefits for KD remain for lacking high‐ to moderate‐quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 14, 15, 27–29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Clark and co-authors for their ongoing interest in our work. 1 Their comments, 2 and published criticisms of our Cochrane review as outlined in our response, 3 are, however, without merit. We did not use 'spurious methods', 'statistical heterogeneity assessment to justify combining VAPOUR in meta-analyses', 'breach Cochrane protocol' or 'inaccurately cite trial data'.…”
Section: Author Replymentioning
confidence: 90%