2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread landslides induced by the Mw 5.1 earthquake of 11 May 2011 in Lorca, SE Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 83 cases have been harvested from published compilations (Keefer, 1984;Hancox et al, 1997;Rodriguez et al, 1999;Bommer and Rodriguez, 2002;Martino et al, 2014) and from recent landslide maps (Table 1). They include the 10 cases with comprehensive landslide inventories described separately below, 36 inventories for which we could access one or several maps with isolines of landslides density or point inventories to check the values reported in published compilations (Bonilla, 1960;Keefer et al, 1980;Harp et al, 1984;Harp and Keefer, 1990;Jibson et al, 1994;Tibaldi et al, 1995;Hancox et al, 1997;Keefer and Manson, 1998;Hancox et al, 2003Hancox et al, , 2004Jibson and Harp, 2006;Mahdavifar et al, 2006;Sato et al, 2007;Kamp et al, 2008;Mosquera-Machado et al, 2009;Alfaro et al, 2012;Collins et al, 2012;Jibson and Harp, 2012;Gorum et al, 2014;Martino et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2014aXu et al, , b, 2015Martha et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016), and a further 37 cases for which we could not access any raw data to evaluate the reported values (Table 1). For 10 earthquakes, detailed landslide inventories with comprehensive maps of the landslide as polygons are available, allowing an objective characterization of A d (as discussed below): the 1976 Guatemala, 1991Limon, 1993Finisterre, 1994Northridge, 1999Chi-Chi, 2004…”
Section: Landslide Maps and Compilations Of Landslide Distribution Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 83 cases have been harvested from published compilations (Keefer, 1984;Hancox et al, 1997;Rodriguez et al, 1999;Bommer and Rodriguez, 2002;Martino et al, 2014) and from recent landslide maps (Table 1). They include the 10 cases with comprehensive landslide inventories described separately below, 36 inventories for which we could access one or several maps with isolines of landslides density or point inventories to check the values reported in published compilations (Bonilla, 1960;Keefer et al, 1980;Harp et al, 1984;Harp and Keefer, 1990;Jibson et al, 1994;Tibaldi et al, 1995;Hancox et al, 1997;Keefer and Manson, 1998;Hancox et al, 2003Hancox et al, , 2004Jibson and Harp, 2006;Mahdavifar et al, 2006;Sato et al, 2007;Kamp et al, 2008;Mosquera-Machado et al, 2009;Alfaro et al, 2012;Collins et al, 2012;Jibson and Harp, 2012;Gorum et al, 2014;Martino et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2014aXu et al, , b, 2015Martha et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016), and a further 37 cases for which we could not access any raw data to evaluate the reported values (Table 1). For 10 earthquakes, detailed landslide inventories with comprehensive maps of the landslide as polygons are available, allowing an objective characterization of A d (as discussed below): the 1976 Guatemala, 1991Limon, 1993Finisterre, 1994Northridge, 1999Chi-Chi, 2004…”
Section: Landslide Maps and Compilations Of Landslide Distribution Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, some inventories of landslides triggered by the Haiti earthquake were also constructed for coseismic landslide spatial distribution analysis and hazard analysis Gorum et al 2013;Harp et al 2011b). The June 14, 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake triggered at least 4,161 landslides (Yagi et al 2009), and the May 11, 2011 Mw 5.1 Lorca, SE Spain earthquake triggered more than 250 landslides (Alfaro et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this aim, five accelerometric records of 11 May 2011 for the Lorca earthquake mainshock were considered, as recorded by the stations ALM, ZAR, VLR, CIE and OLU of the Spanish Strong Ground Motion Network, with distances from the epicenter up to 100 km and azimuthal locations between 313 • and 16 • (Table 3). It is worth noting that the record available from the Lorca (LRC) accelerometric station was excluded because it amplified in the range 1.5-3 Hz for the N-S component and in the range 1.5-2 Hz for the W-E component, as discussed by Alfaro et al (2012).…”
Section: Triggering Input From the Recorded Accelerogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…corresponding to about 8 km distance from the epicenter accelerometric record), a spectral attenuation was specifically processed. This was used because no attenuation law could be regarded as reliable for the studied area (Alfaro et al, 2012). With this aim, five accelerometric records of 11 May 2011 for the Lorca earthquake mainshock were considered, as recorded by the stations ALM, ZAR, VLR, CIE and OLU of the Spanish Strong Ground Motion Network, with distances from the epicenter up to 100 km and azimuthal locations between 313 • and 16 • (Table 3).…”
Section: Triggering Input From the Recorded Accelerogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%