2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Width Attention based Convolutional Neural Network for Retinal Vessel Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate that the proposed method works better on the DRIVE [40] and STARE [41] databases than any other method. The AUC of proposed method for CHASE_DB1 [42] database is slightly below AUCs of MRC NET [48], WA-Net [61], and Bridge-Net [62]. However, it is noteworthy that the F1 score, Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity obtained by our method on the CHASE_DB1 database surpass those of MRC NET [48].…”
Section: ) Experiments 3: Comparative Analysis With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These results demonstrate that the proposed method works better on the DRIVE [40] and STARE [41] databases than any other method. The AUC of proposed method for CHASE_DB1 [42] database is slightly below AUCs of MRC NET [48], WA-Net [61], and Bridge-Net [62]. However, it is noteworthy that the F1 score, Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity obtained by our method on the CHASE_DB1 database surpass those of MRC NET [48].…”
Section: ) Experiments 3: Comparative Analysis With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For a better comparison with these methods, these models are trained using the same experimental settings as in this paper. In addition, we compare the performance with UNet++ [27], Li et al proposed mothed [44], D-MNet [50], WA-Net [51], and TUnet-LBF [52]. Among them, GT U-Net modifies both the encoder and decoder to achieve good performance on tooth segmentation.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%