2017
DOI: 10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wie immanent ist die immanente Kritik? Soziologische Einwände gegen Widerspruchs­freiheit als Ideal der Sozialkritik

Abstract: ZusammenfassungDer erste Teil des Artikels zeigt auf Grundlage der Analyse von Arbeiten zeitgenössischer Kritischer Theoretikerinnen (Honneth, Jaeggi, Stahl), dass die von ihnen angewandte Methode immanenter Sozialkritik ihr Versprechen nicht einlösen kann, ein soziales Gebilde nur an solchen Normen zu messen, die in diesem Gebilde selbst vertreten werden. Zu den von den immanenten Kritikerinnen extern in die Kritik eingebrachten Normen zählt neben konkreten Werthaltungen wie der Ablehnung ökonomischer Ungleic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immanent critique needs to be examined closely on several points. Martin Weißmann [ 8 ], for example, cites two problematic premises of immanent critique: first, the claim that immanent critique is not normativistic, that is, that it applies only those value standards that come from within the social system to be criticized, and, second, “ that a social formation identified as systematically normative in itself is deficient, problematic, and unstable ” [ 8 ]. Regarding the first premise, he states that even immanent critics are bound by external norms when making directional decisions, which is certainly partially true for institutions such as psychiatry, because its borders open into different fields.…”
Section: Immanent Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immanent critique needs to be examined closely on several points. Martin Weißmann [ 8 ], for example, cites two problematic premises of immanent critique: first, the claim that immanent critique is not normativistic, that is, that it applies only those value standards that come from within the social system to be criticized, and, second, “ that a social formation identified as systematically normative in itself is deficient, problematic, and unstable ” [ 8 ]. Regarding the first premise, he states that even immanent critics are bound by external norms when making directional decisions, which is certainly partially true for institutions such as psychiatry, because its borders open into different fields.…”
Section: Immanent Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weißmann [ 8 ] notes that the ideal of freedom from contradiction cannot necessarily be achieved and that contradictions in a system also partly improve the system’s ability to learn and reflect. These objections should be kept in mind, because the goal of complete freedom from contradiction cannot be achieved in a complex and dynamic entity with partly predetermined framework conditions, and certain norms can only be partly transformed in terms of their interpretation.…”
Section: Immanent Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%