1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0424.1992.tb00143.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wife Beating, Domesticity and Women's Independence in Eighteenth‐Century London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I wash myself before we open shop when it does not interfere with my work.'' 63 Although men and women appear not to have been generally segregated in terms of daily activities during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, 64 there were clearly exceptions to this rule where sexual impropriety or modesty were concerned: hence Jones's chiding Heywood for washing when female members of the household were present and for sitting up late in the parlor or kitchen when they wished to mend their clothes (though it was presumably acceptable for men and women to socialize in these spaces at other times). 65 Tim Meldrum has shown how sexual segregation was usual for servants and other unmarried adult household members, 66 which is why Mr. Jones appears to have been concerned that Heywood not be alone with Betty, a domestic servant.…”
Section: Tales From Two Cities: Experiences Of Home and Household In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I wash myself before we open shop when it does not interfere with my work.'' 63 Although men and women appear not to have been generally segregated in terms of daily activities during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, 64 there were clearly exceptions to this rule where sexual impropriety or modesty were concerned: hence Jones's chiding Heywood for washing when female members of the household were present and for sitting up late in the parlor or kitchen when they wished to mend their clothes (though it was presumably acceptable for men and women to socialize in these spaces at other times). 65 Tim Meldrum has shown how sexual segregation was usual for servants and other unmarried adult household members, 66 which is why Mr. Jones appears to have been concerned that Heywood not be alone with Betty, a domestic servant.…”
Section: Tales From Two Cities: Experiences Of Home and Household In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…118 There is no doubt that a husband could disrupt his wife's economic life, but as the advertisements show, men's economic independence was also qualified. 120 Yet there is evidence that wives expected to have control over household resources and retained some sense of possession over moveable goods during marriage, at the same time as willingly putting these goods to familial and household use. 119 Margaret Hunt has commented that men 'monopolized most of the material resources ' in marriage and women owned nothing of their own.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we suggest a re-interpretation of the theoretical concepts of ‘displacement’ and ‘restraint’ through the literature review of both accounting and novels, poetry, essays, and short stories genres (e.g., Camino, 2001a; Dolin, 1993; Hernández-Pecoraro, 1997; Lowe, 1990) to add a gender ‘flavor’ to the analysis of female Benedictine monasteries. In doing this, we expect to contribute to histories of accounting and religion (Abdul-Rahman and Goddard, 1998; Booth, 1993; Carmona and Ezzamel, 2006, 2009; Hernández-Esteve, 2005; Lewis, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%