Wild Chimpanzees Rely on Cultural Knowledge to Solve an Experimental Honey Acquisition Task

Abstract

Population and group-specific behavioral differences have been taken as evidence for animal cultures, a notion that remains controversial. Skeptics argue that ecological or genetic factors, rather than social learning, provide a more parsimonious explanation. Work with captive chimpanzees has addressed this criticism by showing that experimentally created traditions can be transmitted through social learning. Recent fieldwork further suggests that ecological and genetic factors are insufficient to explain the behavioral differences seen between communities, but the data are only observational. Here, we present the results of a field experiment that compared the performance of chimpanzees (P. t. schweinfurthii) from two Ugandan communities, Kanyawara and Sonso, on an identical task in the physical domain-extracting honey from holes drilled into horizontal logs. Kanyawara chimpanzees, who occasionally use sticks to acquire honey, spontaneously manufactured sticks to extract the experimentally provided honey. In contrast, Sonso chimpanzees, who possess a considerable leaf technology but no food-related stick use, relied on their fingers, but some also produced leaf sponges to access the honey. Our results indicate that, when genetic and environmental factors are controlled, wild chimpanzees rely on their cultural knowledge to solve a novel task.

Explaining brain size variation: from social to cultural brain

“…An effect of rearing conditions on cognitive performance in different domains (see [55,93], for reviews). An effect of previous cultural experience on the ability to solve specific problems [94,95]. The finding that even routine skills, such as nest building or mothering behavior, are acquired through social learning (see [55], for a review).…”

Primate archaeology reveals cultural transmission in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus)

“…Only the discovery of tool use in wild chimpanzees forced them to revise the definition of tools [7]. With the emergence of multiple research sites across Africa, it became apparent that chimpanzees exhibit a diverse and regionally specific repertoire of extractive foraging tools, including specialized tool kits, tools used for termite and ant fishing, nut cracking, bone marrow probes, stick brushes for honey extraction and spears for hunting [8][9][10][11], reflecting the cultural variety of tool behaviour [9,[12][13][14]. Most tools used by non-human primates are made of organic materials and therefore cannot be used for investigations of past behaviour as preservation is irrevocably compromised.…”

The psychology of primate cooperation and competition: a call for realigning research agendas

“…social learning) have begun to appear in the primate literature with some regularity (e.g. [89][90][91]). Such a change may denote a change in attitude of some fieldworkers towards field experiments (others like T. Matsuzawa have always combined field and laboratory work, e.g.…”